From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43475)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>) id 1bjFYY-0000Av-M1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:57:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>) id 1bjFYU-0005VL-BC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:57:06 -0400
Received: from mprc.pku.edu.cn ([162.105.203.9]:46152)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>) id 1bjFYT-0005UM-FE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2016 20:57:02 -0400
Message-ID: <64501.117.114.135.40.1473641469.squirrel@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-dyahrrzwk_mc2ad6x-Su21RSua1UA+8LS=rfWA6126w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFEAcA8zz0AYcy60fknmxa3chTsEyq0OvhvHpnSRF-Utgvf2oA@mail.gmail.com>
	<fed3df5b-9df7-40bd-8906-5ceb57d1c76a@iki.fi>
	<CAFEAcA8KE1v8nmucm_Vc=4E8f5osUMQvBTcdiiHYb21G8wW=UA@mail.gmail.com>
	<57570.117.114.135.40.1465911787.squirrel@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
	<CAFEAcA-dyahrrzwk_mc2ad6x-Su21RSua1UA+8LS=rfWA6126w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:51:09 +0800 (CST)
From: "Xuetao Guan" <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
Reply-To: gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: drop linux-user unicore32 support from
 QEMU
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

> On 14 June 2016 at 14:43, Xuetao Guan <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> wrote:
>>> On 20 May 2016 at 13:48, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>> On torstaina 12. toukokuuta 2016 17.34.42 EEST, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>>> We should either fix our unicore32 support to use the real
>>>>> syscall numbers, or just drop it; since nobody has touched
>>>>> linux-user/unicore32 since 2012, and there have been no
>>>>> commits to target-unicore32 that aren't generic "clean up
>>>>> all targets" type patches since 2012 or 2013, and nobody
>>>>> has ever complained that the syscall numbers are all broken,
>>>>> my initial inclination is to say we should just drop this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>>> I agree. I don't have a test setup for unicore, so unicore
>>>> has seen nothing but compile testing...
>>>
>>> I've put a note in the 2.7 Changelog saying we're going to
>>> remove unicore32-linux-user in 2.8.
>
>> I'm the maintainer of target-unicore32.
>> Though there's no commit since 2012, we're using qemu (but
>> old version) to test our new kernel and software-images.
>> I'll upgrade to new qemu and fix syscall problem.
>
> Hi -- just a reminder that I would like to see the unicore32
> support updated to use the correct syscall numbers if we
> are not to remove the code for 2.8. You have until about
> the middle of October before 2.8 softfreeze.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
Sure, I'll fix it in this month.
Sorry for inconvenience.

Xuetao