All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Menage <menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Linux Containers <containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: cgroup attach/fork hooks consistency with the ns_cgroup
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:21:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6599ad830906171821v3c97f176y65bd4b7fa9a405e9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617212614.GA26781-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Serge E. Hallyn<serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> The ns cgroup is really only good for preventing root in a container
> from escaping its cgroup-imposed limits.  The same can be done today
> using smack or selinux, and eventually will be possible using user
> namespaces.  Would anyone object to removing ns_cgroup?

Sounds reasonable to me. It feels to me that there ought to be some
good way to integrate namespaces and cgroups, but I'm not quite sure
exactly how, and ns_cgroup sort of hovers in the "toy" category rather
than something very useful.

Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-18  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-17 15:35 cgroup attach/fork hooks consistency with the ns_cgroup Daniel Lezcano
     [not found] ` <4A390D5D.5040702-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-17 21:26   ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]     ` <20090617212614.GA26781-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-18  1:21       ` Li Zefan
2009-06-18  1:21       ` Paul Menage [this message]
     [not found]         ` <6599ad830906171821v3c97f176y65bd4b7fa9a405e9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-18 13:45           ` Serge E. Hallyn
     [not found]             ` <20090618134527.GA3186-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-18 18:36               ` Daniel Lezcano
     [not found]                 ` <4A3A891C.8020305-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-18 18:41                   ` Paul Menage
     [not found]                     ` <6599ad830906181141w1669d154j22277070ae221a76-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-18 20:08                       ` Daniel Lezcano
     [not found]                         ` <4A3A9ECD.9040908-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-19 13:59                           ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6599ad830906171821v3c97f176y65bd4b7fa9a405e9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=menage-hpiqsd4aklfqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.