From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B35C25B4E for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2023 04:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229597AbjAVEpA (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 23:45:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229493AbjAVEo6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 23:44:58 -0500 Received: from mail.zytor.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::138]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBB223131 for ; Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([73.223.250.219]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 30M4ifcP1810703 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:44:41 -0800 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.zytor.com 30M4ifcP1810703 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zytor.com; s=2023010601; t=1674362682; bh=9Ab0ZijIloczLbeQG6t/QkuzyM4WvID+T58SXRdtSVc=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BPbLJU3DuoKO3bcAyH/dElIU0H9XvgdJDXsFkCekZKEZJdlGRmLjXGt6w4rlxNSOE ffFPJaFdEXDIxcx7cVcbLRQBgjn49E4Bz090L+Ry3o7QS73RV1NuTigRy0FL6a7UX8 PmnAi2H4lX/zHkVVknR9gtP4sfA0D3Mpxw3NL5xZOMg5zh1lChMJxBHBALCiUzyCBq 0vE5nv6jMuwPGHK9a+X/fiw6KBfrNGifgTSvBpjkysuFahq+BBRPxeBqj0KTq67m93 eAwap1Thzj3F4zK+hK/OsV1FS8K09paElb30OSRuhG059d2cMDeRma85TpTbSYMssT cslfshLkx6/iw== Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 20:44:38 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" To: Dave Hansen , "Li, Xin3" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "peterz@infradead.org" , "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" CC: "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: the x86 sysret_rip test fails on the Intel FRED architecture User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <5d4ad3e3-034f-c7da-d141-9c001c2343af@intel.com> <18B5DB6D-AEBD-4A67-A7B3-CE64940819B7@zytor.com> Message-ID: <65D9F1DE-96D4-4CC7-A21C-A740B7DDE0C8@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On January 21, 2023 8:34:09 PM PST, Dave Hansen = wrote: >On 1/21/23 19:38, Li, Xin3 wrote: >>> However, it doesn't seem to make sense to do so to me=2E The current b= ehavior is >>> much more of an artifact than desired behavior=2E >> We kind of have an agreement that %r11 =3D %flags after returning from = the kernel=2E >>=20 >> And the question is, is it what we want? > >Can the selftest just set r11=3Drflags before the syscall? The old >syscall entry path will set r11=3Drflags=2E The FRED path won't touch it= =2E >Either case will pass an r11=3D=3Drflags check=2E That's a good idea=2E