From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932927Ab1LFDmR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:42:17 -0500 Received: from am1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com ([213.199.154.208]:11105 "EHLO AM1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932881Ab1LFDmP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:42:15 -0500 X-SpamScore: -17 X-BigFish: VS-17(zz9371K542M1432N98dKzz1202hzzz2dh2a8h668h839h8e2h8e3h944h) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:70.37.183.190;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:mail.freescale.net;RD:none;EFVD:NLI From: Dong Aisheng-B29396 To: Linus Walleij , Sascha Hauer CC: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linus.walleij@stericsson.com" , Guo Shawn-R65073 , "kernel@pengutronix.de" Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support Thread-Index: AQHMsnlB4tyTDOR3uEmPDrmj3tcvppXMPl6AgAGgQACAAE5AcA== Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 03:42:11 +0000 Message-ID: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7723457FD@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <1322999384-7886-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1322999384-7886-2-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <20111204161123.GS27267@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.192.242.89] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: freescale.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 AM > To: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Dong Aisheng-B29396; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@lists.infradead.org; linus.walleij@stericsson.com; Guo Shawn- > R65073; kernel@pengutronix.de > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Sascha Hauer > wrote: > > > I don't think that this grouping of pads to their functions makes > > sense. On i.MX every pad is muxed independently and not in groups. > > Which pins belong to which function is board specific and not SoC > > specific. > > True, Dong can this be moved to the imx pinctrl platform data and passed > in from arch/arm/[plat|mach]-* board files instead? > That is probably where it belongs today. > Yes, I will do that. > I know that this data is in drivers/pinctrl for the U300 and SIRF, but > that is because they only have one single board variant. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Regards Dong Aisheng From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: B29396@freescale.com (Dong Aisheng-B29396) Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 03:42:11 +0000 Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support In-Reply-To: References: <1322999384-7886-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1322999384-7886-2-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <20111204161123.GS27267@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F7723457FD@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij at linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 AM > To: Sascha Hauer > Cc: Dong Aisheng-B29396; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel at lists.infradead.org; linus.walleij at stericsson.com; Guo Shawn- > R65073; kernel at pengutronix.de > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support > > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Sascha Hauer > wrote: > > > I don't think that this grouping of pads to their functions makes > > sense. On i.MX every pad is muxed independently and not in groups. > > Which pins belong to which function is board specific and not SoC > > specific. > > True, Dong can this be moved to the imx pinctrl platform data and passed > in from arch/arm/[plat|mach]-* board files instead? > That is probably where it belongs today. > Yes, I will do that. > I know that this data is in drivers/pinctrl for the U300 and SIRF, but > that is because they only have one single board variant. > > Yours, > Linus Walleij Regards Dong Aisheng