From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SxFN4-00036E-0D for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 12:44:42 +0200 Received: by yenl13 with SMTP id l13so591521yen.6 for ; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:33:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Cd58IXv6AHlOEXQHBdBS56SHRZF6jh0uDbUbtH8Yusg=; b=B+bJA2B0EaNYI0E/sZzUYrvOL1z/YIm24/yHu2OBXjFHv+nWbTXmbunWC9nhuN+1EZ NOVIhdiOXMM10N6hUX/zuKZOhwFGHPdqFPbheBhNGETuGd/VBZmjFwuvWHe785HR3C+B Le33Q8WYOzkFQXCvZzUIhtH4W/jlrNbOqCJ/LKWOFA3gwxzF2VcEm4ZrYfL65CThyTnA j9+bQgw3jKA99075omKhkfhM68BCW4Nh1oql5HqEx+vFydrREkEJUDkGGlasXfKW3ugl 48azKZS8u9IYJhJe93+KX5GRQC/mTesvcL8Zt2oKtawPnm6D/NIahy9xycma4TnxRv+o AGIg== Received: by 10.43.124.201 with SMTP id gp9mr1946383icc.47.1343989980389; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kraj-sslvpn-nc.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net. [66.129.224.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o1sm21679347igm.16.2012.08.03.03.32.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\)) From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <671950423.c3foblMkXu@helios> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 03:32:57 -0700 Message-Id: <6602C8C9-45EA-47B9-B446-C96264B142B7@gmail.com> References: <1343760977-3290-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com> <671950423.c3foblMkXu@helios> To: Paul Eggleton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485) Cc: Koen Kooi , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-systemd][PATCH V2 1/7] systemd: Upgrade to 187 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:44:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Paul Eggleton = wrote: > On Wednesday 01 August 2012 15:56:34 Khem Raj wrote: >> On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Koen Kooi = wrote: >>>> Along with upgrade use the release tarballs instead of git >>>=20 >>> For an update we need to pull in some patches from master, so a git = recipe >>> is still the preferred way. >>=20 >> OK, you know more about it then me but do you know how many those = will be ? >> in other words does systemd releases mean much for stability yet or = still >> its a project moving at so fast pace ? >>=20 >> I see that releases are rolled out almost every month, that sort of = could >> mean either way, we wait until the next release or just take from a = commit >> upstream >>=20 >> I feel like staying with a release+patches could be one way if we are = not >> importing pathes too often. but I don't know how often that would be. = For >> the testing I did release worked well for those platforms x86, ppc = and arm >=20 > One might suggest, if stable releases are working and you want to live = on the=20 > bleeding edge in your distro, you can easily do so there=85 This is moving forward from where we were so it includes all the git = commits that were there until cd96b3b86abb4a88cac2722bdfb6e5d4413f6831 commit so this = update is inclusive. we can also think of having a stable recipe and a git recipe but systemd = releases are almost a month apart it would be more or less covered if we moved = from release to release with some patches if needed. thirdly we can have two recipes as Paul suggested. >=20 > Cheers, > Paul >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre