All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>,
	Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Cc: "Sarvela, Tomi P" <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx]  ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC v49
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:36:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <661176f4-2ead-0ce7-ce1a-5ff7e982660b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16a5587c-bf6f-7870-e38c-865aec642024@Intel.com>



On 9/21/2020 12:22 PM, John Harrison wrote:
> On 9/16/2020 23:48, Petri Latvala wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 06:22:45PM -0700, John Harrison wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The failures below all appear to be because the new GuC firmware was 
>>> not
>>> found on the test system.
>>>
>>> My understanding is that all we need to do to get the CI system to 
>>> update
>>> with new firmwares is to push the firmware to a branch on the FDO
>>> drm-firmware repo and then send a pull request to this mailing list. 
>>> That
>>> was done yesterday.
>> That pull request used an ssh:// url though. Can you send it again
>> with a git:// url? I suppose that's a plausible reason why I don't see
>> the binaries in CI's deploy dir.
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> We reset the pull request with a git:// URL as requested. I even gave 
> it a full weekend to propagate through. However, I am still getting 
> missing firmware failures after posting a new patch set.
>
> John.
>

You sure you're looking at the correct logs? AFAICS BAT on the new 
patches passed (https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/81906/) and I 
see the correct GuC being loaded in the logs.
e.g. 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_18542/fi-icl-u2/boot0.txt:

<6>[    9.283866] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] GuC firmware 
i915/icl_guc_49.0.1.bin version 49.0 submission:disabled

Daniele
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-21 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-16 17:16 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC v49 John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/12] drm/i915/guc: New GuC IDs based on engine class and instance John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/12] drm/i915/guc: Support logical engine mapping table in ADS John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 23:27   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2020-09-17  1:19     ` John Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/12] drm/i915/guc: Setup private_data pointer in GuC ADS John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 23:30   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/guc: Remove GUC_CTL_CTXINFO init param John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 23:32   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/12] drm/i915/guc: Kill guc_ads.reg_state_buffer John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 23:46   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/12] drm/i915/guc: ADS changes for GuC v42 John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/12] drm/i915/guc: Setup doorbells data in ADS John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/12] drm/i915/guc: Increased engine classes " John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/12] drm/i915/guc: Update firmware to v49.0.1 John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/12] drm/i915/guc: Improved reporting when GuC fails to load John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/12] drm/i915/guc: Clear pointers on free John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 17:16 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915/uc: turn on GuC/HuC auto mode by default John.C.Harrison
2020-09-16 18:09 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc: Update to GuC v49 Patchwork
2020-09-16 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-09-17  1:22   ` John Harrison
2020-09-17  6:35     ` Saarinen, Jani
2020-09-17  6:48     ` Petri Latvala
2020-09-21 19:22       ` John Harrison
2020-09-21 20:36         ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2020-09-21 21:21           ` John Harrison
2020-09-16 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/12] " Daniele Ceraolo Spurio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=661176f4-2ead-0ce7-ce1a-5ff7e982660b@intel.com \
    --to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
    --cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=petri.latvala@intel.com \
    --cc=tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.