From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:45317 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728044AbeK2AFX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2018 19:05:23 -0500 From: Simon Horman To: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Magnus Damm , Phil Edworthy , Simon Horman Subject: [PATCH 16/16] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Correct the GIC DT node name Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:03:18 +0100 Message-Id: <673df60a880f060e3e94920c7b5f7a9ed8aa65f2.1543409901.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au> In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Phil Edworthy Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations for the node names: "The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices: ... interrupt-controller" Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Simon Horman --- arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi index 2322268bc862..4c1ab49c7d39 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ status = "okay"; }; - gic: gic@44101000 { + gic: interrupt-controller@44101000 { compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", "arm,gic-400"; interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <3>; -- 2.11.0 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms+renesas@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:03:18 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 16/16] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Correct the GIC DT node name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <673df60a880f060e3e94920c7b5f7a9ed8aa65f2.1543409901.git.horms+renesas@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org From: Phil Edworthy Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations for the node names: "The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices: ... interrupt-controller" Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Simon Horman --- arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi index 2322268bc862..4c1ab49c7d39 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r9a06g032.dtsi @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ status = "okay"; }; - gic: gic at 44101000 { + gic: interrupt-controller at 44101000 { compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-gic", "arm,gic-400"; interrupt-controller; #interrupt-cells = <3>; -- 2.11.0