All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Étienne Phélip" <etienne.phelip@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC 4/4] board/acmesystems/aria-g25: set BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:44:32 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <674007428.52191.1491831872252.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405181424.1d69fee5@free-electrons.com>

Good morning everyone,

----- Le 5 Avr 17, ? 12:14, Thomas Petazzoni thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com a ?crit :

> Hello,
> 
> On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 17:02:36 +0200, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> 
>>  Combined with the other discussion in this thread, long-term I see us evolving
>> towards:
>> 
>> - deprecate some of the finer-grain fs tuning options we have now;
>> - always using genimage to generate the target filesystems;
>> - position our fs targets more as a 'quick fix' solution than for production;
>> - make host-e2fsprogs etc. blind options again.
> 
> To be honest, I am not sure I share this long-term view. I like the way
> things are done today, very modular: we can generate just a filesystem
> image, optionally use genimage afterwards, etc. So the "always using
> genimage to generate the target filesystem" is not something that I see
> as an improvement, for example.

To sum things up:
 - Should I add BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES or reuse the script in the
postimage script
 - if BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES is choosen, should it 'depends on' or
'select' BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_GENIMAGE?
 - should I convert all boards or just the one already in this RFC?

Best regards
-Etienne

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-10 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-29 14:51 [Buildroot] [RFC 0/4] add genimage Kconfig entry Etienne Phelip
2017-03-29 14:51 ` [Buildroot] [RFC 1/4] support/scripts: add generic genimage script Etienne Phelip
2017-03-30 22:51   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-01 13:50   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-03-29 14:51 ` [Buildroot] [RFC 2/4] system: add option to pass genimage config files Etienne Phelip
2017-03-29 14:51 ` [Buildroot] [RFC 3/4] configs/raspberrypi3_defconfig: set BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES Etienne Phelip
2017-03-29 14:51 ` [Buildroot] [RFC 4/4] board/acmesystems/aria-g25: " Etienne Phelip
2017-03-30 22:51   ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-03-31  7:46     ` Andreas Naumann
2017-03-31 16:34       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-03 13:01         ` Andreas Naumann
2017-04-03 13:54           ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-05  6:38             ` Andreas Naumann
2017-04-05 12:38               ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-01 13:51     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-03  9:06       ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-04-03  9:35         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-04 21:34           ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-04-05 15:02             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2017-04-05 16:14               ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-04-10 13:44                 ` Étienne Phélip [this message]
2017-04-10 15:06                   ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=674007428.52191.1491831872252.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --to=etienne.phelip@savoirfairelinux.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    --subject='Re: [Buildroot] [RFC 4/4] board/acmesystems/aria-g25: set BR2_GENIMAGE_CFG_FILES' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.