From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753258AbaBMGvS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:51:18 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:48707 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752397AbaBMGvN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 01:51:13 -0500 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@rjwysocki.net Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, jinchoi@broadcom.com, tianyu.lan@intel.com, sebastian.capella@linaro.org, jhbird.choi@samsung.com, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH V5 5/7] cpufreq: exynos: Use cpufreq_generic_suspend() Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 12:20:20 +0530 Message-Id: <677ff70e67a69b772d63395ca1373d9749c56197.1392273723.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently we have implemented PM notifiers to disable/enable ->target() routines functionality during suspend/resume. Now we have support present in cpufreq core, lets use it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 96 +++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index fcd2914..307f02e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include @@ -24,12 +23,8 @@ #include "exynos-cpufreq.h" static struct exynos_dvfs_info *exynos_info; - static struct regulator *arm_regulator; - static unsigned int locking_frequency; -static bool frequency_locked; -static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock); static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq) { @@ -134,83 +129,13 @@ out: static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index) { - struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; - int ret = 0; - - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - - if (frequency_locked) - goto out; - - ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freq_table[index].frequency); - -out: - mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - - return ret; -} - -#ifdef CONFIG_PM -static int exynos_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ - return 0; -} - -static int exynos_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ - return 0; -} -#endif - -/** - * exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier - block CPUFREQ's activities in suspend-resume - * context - * @notifier - * @pm_event - * @v - * - * While frequency_locked == true, target() ignores every frequency but - * locking_frequency. The locking_frequency value is the initial frequency, - * which is set by the bootloader. In order to eliminate possible - * inconsistency in clock values, we save and restore frequencies during - * suspend and resume and block CPUFREQ activities. Note that the standard - * suspend/resume cannot be used as they are too deep (syscore_ops) for - * regulator actions. - */ -static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier, - unsigned long pm_event, void *v) -{ - int ret; - - switch (pm_event) { - case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE: - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - frequency_locked = true; - mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - - ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(locking_frequency); - if (ret < 0) - return NOTIFY_BAD; - - break; - - case PM_POST_SUSPEND: - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - frequency_locked = false; - mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - break; - } - - return NOTIFY_OK; + return exynos_cpufreq_scale(exynos_info->freq_table[index].frequency); } -static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = { - .notifier_call = exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier, -}; - static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { policy->clk = exynos_info->cpu_clk; + policy->suspend_freq = locking_frequency; return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, exynos_info->freq_table, 100000); } @@ -227,8 +152,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = { .boost_supported = true, #endif #ifdef CONFIG_PM - .suspend = exynos_cpufreq_suspend, - .resume = exynos_cpufreq_resume, + .suspend = cpufreq_generic_suspend, #endif }; @@ -263,19 +187,13 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_vdd_arm; } + /* Done here as we want to capture boot frequency */ locking_frequency = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000; - register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb); - - if (cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver)) { - pr_err("%s: failed to register cpufreq driver\n", __func__); - goto err_cpufreq; - } - - return 0; -err_cpufreq: - unregister_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb); + if (!cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver)) + return 0; + pr_err("%s: failed to register cpufreq driver\n", __func__); regulator_put(arm_regulator); err_vdd_arm: kfree(exynos_info); -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e