From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A223DC2BA19 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42E20644 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733158AbgDPBi5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:38:57 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:2114 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726201AbgDPBiv (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:38:51 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 079307B60A37B2BB8BEE; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from DGGEMM421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.38) by DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:47 +0800 Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.76]) by dggemm421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:46 +0800 From: "Zengtao (B)" To: Marc Zyngier CC: George Cherian , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" , "alexandru.elisei@arm.com" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , "christoffer.dall@arm.com" , "james.morse@arm.com" , "jintack@cs.columbia.edu" , "julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "suzuki.poulose@arm.com" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , Ganapatrao Kulkarni Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Thread-Index: AdYJhvrCKEKaxySRQua1lfr4U9NN2v//iESA//MqKcCAGX9aAP/4ImVg Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:38:45 +0000 Message-ID: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.74.221.187] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc: Got it. Really a bit patch set :) BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1, The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test) My platform: Hisilicon D06 board. Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases) Could you help to take a look? Thanks Zengtao > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org] > Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM > To: Zengtao (B) > Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com; > andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com; > james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu; > julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested > Virtualization support > > Hi Zengtao, > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, > "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > > > Hi Marc: > > > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > > > Any suggestion about the test focus? > > Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every > architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful > testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. > > Thanks, > > M. > > -- > Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828DDC2BB55 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13D8206E9 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 11:10:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D13D8206E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E60F4B211; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:10:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2gsUEjfv11u; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:10:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007D84B226; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:10:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415104B18D for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:38:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zeutFFJ0ewk3 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:38:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 690564B15D for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 21:38:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 079307B60A37B2BB8BEE; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from DGGEMM421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.38) by DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:47 +0800 Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.76]) by dggemm421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:46 +0800 From: "Zengtao (B)" To: Marc Zyngier Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Thread-Index: AdYJhvrCKEKaxySRQua1lfr4U9NN2v//iESA//MqKcCAGX9aAP/4ImVg Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:38:45 +0000 Message-ID: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.74.221.187] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:10:16 -0400 Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , George Cherian , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Marc: Got it. Really a bit patch set :) BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1, The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test) My platform: Hisilicon D06 board. Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases) Could you help to take a look? Thanks Zengtao > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org] > Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM > To: Zengtao (B) > Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com; > andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com; > james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu; > julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested > Virtualization support > > Hi Zengtao, > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, > "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > > > Hi Marc: > > > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > > > Any suggestion about the test focus? > > Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every > architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful > testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. > > Thanks, > > M. > > -- > Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE49C2BA19 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F53B20644 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="n/zrcIxu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8F53B20644 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hisilicon.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=2YE1QNlrlRPFo619WD0uqmy/sRqme+pSIIkSu6ZUO8U=; b=n/zrcIxun/0OLw QRP0/Zk1ReHtCiVWinb6kVu35KAnfLwwOrOSVcDhpoeKSuP4GuesQruUBX2PlwY8+++aOWpQ+kctS PeYfsITrO3SIdDs+Xaqelha4Ln6GfD7mch+ly8z3/Ya+b6cqHF1VzOuXvJlrBCPMLovMtg3WO8/lM 652EdzwwjEnaSSMQroc2qGzfiEhk3kqCROG66zu3YOEXO8pLWK9yApioUzg/TyR1oGbGeXO4MxCn2 tk6kshpVfgqyviXqSp17xIjoCg9kFrvY4tQUSFOCXxit1u45YQSXR7InRrzutuoYMO36L0tGNAabq iUHQoFKsMNXOZV/qvEsQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOtUf-0003WS-T0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:39:05 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jOtUb-0003Vb-2F for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:39:03 +0000 Received: from DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 079307B60A37B2BB8BEE; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from DGGEMM421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.38) by DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:47 +0800 Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.76]) by dggemm421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:38:46 +0800 From: "Zengtao (B)" To: Marc Zyngier Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support Thread-Index: AdYJhvrCKEKaxySRQua1lfr4U9NN2v//iESA//MqKcCAGX9aAP/4ImVg Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:38:45 +0000 Message-ID: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.74.221.187] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200415_183901_285669_8591FAAB X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.02 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "suzuki.poulose@arm.com" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , "christoffer.dall@arm.com" , "jintack@cs.columbia.edu" , George Cherian , "james.morse@arm.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Anil Kumar Reddy H , "alexandru.elisei@arm.com" , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" , "julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Marc: Got it. Really a bit patch set :) BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1, The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test) My platform: Hisilicon D06 board. Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases) Could you help to take a look? Thanks Zengtao > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org] > Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM > To: Zengtao (B) > Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com; > andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com; > james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu; > julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org; > kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested > Virtualization support > > Hi Zengtao, > > On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, > "Zengtao (B)" wrote: > > > > Hi Marc: > > > > Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform > > which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series > > affects the existed virtualization functions or not. > > > > Any suggestion about the test focus? > > Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every > architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful > testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. > > Thanks, > > M. > > -- > Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel