From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Bukatovic Subject: ceph-mgr and tendrl Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:50:51 +0200 Message-ID: <678aa95f-73de-f309-c821-495c446e25f4@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47664 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751621AbcINJuy (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:50:54 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C80C05678F for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: tendrl-devel@redhat.com, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Dear all, we may need to check the current plans of the ceph community to introduce a new component of the ceph stack: ceph-mgr The original idea has been shared some time ago here: * https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-devel/msg28047.html * http://pad.ceph.com/p/ceph-mgr While this service seems to be concerned with additional features which may not be the best fit for adding into the MON daemons and as such there seems to be no or little overlap with what tendrl will to be doing, it's clear that both tendrl and ceph-mgr components need to cooperate, and so the dev teams would benefit from discussing their ideas from the early on. -- Martin Bukatovic USM QE team