From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Pribil?= Subject: RE: Deadlock with restart_syscall() Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:24 +0200 Message-ID: <681500CE65202E47A192754B01DAB4673BE3D88235@SDE12.beckipc.net> References: <681500CE65202E47A192754B01DAB4673BE3D87D8D@SDE12.beckipc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Pribil?= , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" Return-path: Received: from mx.beck-ipc.com ([195.243.140.130]:55061 "EHLO mx.beck-ipc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726034AbeG0Kw1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 06:52:27 -0400 Received: from remote.beck-ipc.com (sde12.beckipc.net [172.30.2.12]) by mx.beck-ipc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8D4911FE68 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:31:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <681500CE65202E47A192754B01DAB4673BE3D87D8D@SDE12.beckipc.net> Content-Language: de-DE Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > I've found this thread, where a similar issue with restart_syscall() > has been reported: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg415144.html Found another old report about restart_syscall() producing a dead loop: https://lists.gt.net/linux/kernel/2371438 I do not agree with the conclusion there that the user space should be to blame for this. I also see no ugly priority games in my scenario. No one who wants to say anything about this? Andre