From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Jarrige <eric.jarrige@armadeus.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:04:17 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] DM9000: change some printf to use debug
	instead
In-Reply-To: <20110824202056.71C1211F9E78@gemini.denx.de>
References: <20110810200828.21204.60050.stgit@shuttle2.etheralp.ch>
	<20110810203340.21204.45508.stgit@shuttle2.etheralp.ch>
	<4E438441.6040409@gmail.com> <m2k4akcr6h.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
	<2B613989-ADDB-43D6-A8C3-A30D5245262A@armadeus.org>
	<20110824202056.71C1211F9E78@gemini.denx.de>
Message-ID: <683E266C-CDFB-4310-8145-1926C6FCCBD8@armadeus.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Dear Wolfgang,

On 24 ao?t 2011, at 22:20, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> Dear Eric Jarrige,
> 
> In message <2B613989-ADDB-43D6-A8C3-A30D5245262A@armadeus.org> you wrote:
>> 
>>>> I'am just wondering: I see that DM9000_DBG is used all over dm9000 code 
>>>> - do you know the reason why not just use debug()?
>> 
>> dm9000 does not use debug() at all.
>> That's the reason to fix the printf issues as a first priority by using the DM9000_DBG.
> 
> NAK.
> 
> If you touch that, then please do it right: us debug() instead, and
> remove DM9000_DBG.  Thanks.

Do you mean both changes in one patch?

Best regards,
Eric