From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936444AbaFIJ1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 05:27:39 -0400 Received: from ip4-83-240-18-248.cust.nbox.cz ([83.240.18.248]:59137 "EHLO ip4-83-240-18-248.cust.nbox.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936418AbaFIJ1f (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jun 2014 05:27:35 -0400 From: Jiri Slaby To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Mel Gorman , Nishanth Aravamudan , Luiz Capitulino , Masayoshi Mizuma , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Slaby Subject: [PATCH 3.12 067/146] mm/page-writeback.c: fix divide by zero in pos_ratio_polynom Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 10:50:02 +0200 Message-Id: <68d2ecc46104bf57213ee0bb8aa067319f3544a8.1402303821.git.jslaby@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.3 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rik van Riel 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== commit d5c9fde3dae750889168807038243ff36431d276 upstream. It is possible for "limit - setpoint + 1" to equal zero, after getting truncated to a 32 bit variable, and resulting in a divide by zero error. Using the fully 64 bit divide functions avoids this problem. It also will cause pos_ratio_polynom() to return the correct value when (setpoint - limit) exceeds 2^32. Also uninline pos_ratio_polynom, at Andrew's request. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Cc: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Masayoshi Mizuma Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- mm/page-writeback.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index 7106cb1aca8e..8f6daa62206d 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -593,14 +593,14 @@ unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned long dirty) * (5) the closer to setpoint, the smaller |df/dx| (and the reverse) * => fast response on large errors; small oscillation near setpoint */ -static inline long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint, +static long long pos_ratio_polynom(unsigned long setpoint, unsigned long dirty, unsigned long limit) { long long pos_ratio; long x; - x = div_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT, + x = div64_s64(((s64)setpoint - (s64)dirty) << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT, limit - setpoint + 1); pos_ratio = x; pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT; @@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ static unsigned long bdi_position_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, x_intercept = bdi_setpoint + span; if (bdi_dirty < x_intercept - span / 4) { - pos_ratio = div_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty), + pos_ratio = div64_u64(pos_ratio * (x_intercept - bdi_dirty), x_intercept - bdi_setpoint + 1); } else pos_ratio /= 4; -- 1.9.3