On 02/27/2017 05:45 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 02/27/2017 02:36 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:21:21 -0800
>> David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> See attached for mips.  It seems to do the right thing.
>>>
>>> I leave it as an exercise to the reader to fix the other architectures.
>>>
>>> Consult your own  binutils experts to verify that what I say is true.
>>
>> It may still just be safer to do the pointers instead. That way we
>> don't need to worry about some strange arch or off by one binutils
>> messing it up.
>
> Obviously it is your choice, but this is bog standard ELF linking.  In
> theory even the arrays of power-of-2 sized objects should also supply an
> entity size.  Think __ex_table and its ilk.
>
>
> The benefit of supplying an entsize is that you don't have to change the
> structure of the existing code and risk breaking something in the process.
>
> David Daney
>
>

Thanks for the suggestion! I would like to see if this resolves the ppc 
issue we had. I'm attaching a powerpc patch based on your suggestion. 
Hopefully, Sachin can try it.

Thanks,

-Jason