From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:48:57 +0100
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] package/can-utils: add license
	information
In-Reply-To: <20170303123100.6ce4254a@free-electrons.com>
References: <68ff344f-81de-b4a4-9762-b117154cd751@grandegger.com>
 <20170303123100.6ce4254a@free-electrons.com>
Message-ID: <698e2ecb-9110-8e9e-6c4b-7847aead0d5a@grandegger.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hello,

Am 03.03.2017 um 12:31 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:26:01 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
>>  CAN_UTILS_VERSION = c3305fdd515464153d20199db232b6124bc962c0
>>  CAN_UTILS_SITE = $(call github,linux-can,can-utils,$(CAN_UTILS_VERSION))
>> +CAN_UTILS_LICENSE = BSD-3c or GPLv2, GPLv2+
>
> As I said in my previous review, could you identify which parts are
> under which license?

I already answered! Unfortunately just to the ml, sorry.

http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2017-March/185530.html

Should I list each utility using on of the two licences?

Wolfgang