diff for duplicates of <6992049.xPdnW5VfcJ@merkaba>
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 0442bf8..691a6d8 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -6,27 +6,26 @@ Ming Lei - 02.06.18, 06:54:
> > >> not already elevated. Though that would be expensive, compared
> > >> to the percpu inc now. Not saying the bit is necessarily the
> > >> best way forward, but I do like it a LOT more than adding an
-> > >> argument to generic_make_request.> >=20
+> > >> argument to generic_make_request.> >
> > > We may introduce generic_make_request_with_ref() for
> > > blk_queue_split(), what do you think of the following patch?
-> >=20
+> >
> > Functionally it'll work as well.
->=20
+>
> If you are fine with this one, I'm glad to prepare for a normal one,
> so that we can save one precious bio flag, and the total number is
> just 13.
-[=E2=80=A6]
+[…]
I am completely lost about what you are talking about.
-That is fine with me, but in case there is anything to test=E2=80=A6 let me=
-=20
-know. I do not promise quick responses tough, as I have been quite a bit=20
+That is fine with me, but in case there is anything to test… let me
+know. I do not promise quick responses tough, as I have been quite a bit
overwhelmed with stuff lately.
-Currently I run 4.17-rc7 without any blk-mq related patches and it=20
+Currently I run 4.17-rc7 without any blk-mq related patches and it
appears to be free of hangs or stalls related to blk-mq.
Thanks,
-=2D-=20
+--
Martin
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 40a98fb..ed825e2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -54,30 +54,29 @@
"> > >> not already elevated. Though that would be expensive, compared\n",
"> > >> to the percpu inc now. Not saying the bit is necessarily the\n",
"> > >> best way forward, but I do like it a LOT more than adding an\n",
- "> > >> argument to generic_make_request.> >=20\n",
+ "> > >> argument to generic_make_request.> > \n",
"> > > We may introduce generic_make_request_with_ref() for\n",
"> > > blk_queue_split(), what do you think of the following patch?\n",
- "> >=20\n",
+ "> > \n",
"> > Functionally it'll work as well.\n",
- ">=20\n",
+ "> \n",
"> If you are fine with this one, I'm glad to prepare for a normal one,\n",
"> so that we can save one precious bio flag, and the total number is\n",
"> just 13.\n",
- "[=E2=80=A6]\n",
+ "[\342\200\246]\n",
"\n",
"I am completely lost about what you are talking about.\n",
"\n",
- "That is fine with me, but in case there is anything to test=E2=80=A6 let me=\n",
- "=20\n",
- "know. I do not promise quick responses tough, as I have been quite a bit=20\n",
+ "That is fine with me, but in case there is anything to test\342\200\246 let me \n",
+ "know. I do not promise quick responses tough, as I have been quite a bit \n",
"overwhelmed with stuff lately.\n",
"\n",
- "Currently I run 4.17-rc7 without any blk-mq related patches and it=20\n",
+ "Currently I run 4.17-rc7 without any blk-mq related patches and it \n",
"appears to be free of hangs or stalls related to blk-mq.\n",
"\n",
"Thanks,\n",
- "=2D-=20\n",
+ "-- \n",
"Martin"
]
-dceffbb8d521af60d8ccde3497b34e63fada4c0fb8b00f0e02c4dafec2c5f87e
+256ac3b03f4e009eeb802349164e7c3f701917cc27835c528ca79011c7f83a70
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.