From: "Tom Worster" <fsb@thefsb.org>
To: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recommendations for balancing as part of regular maintenance?
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:16:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6A139191-C846-41DA-AE60-44115E0C17C6@thefsb.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33ee8802-df5a-b153-6e24-2b38be597846@gmail.com>
On 9 Jan 2018, at 7:23, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
> On 2018-01-08 16:43, Tom Worster wrote:
>>
>> Given the documentation and the usage stats, I did not know what
>> options to use with balance. I spent some time reading and
>> researching and trying to understand the filters and how they should
>> relate to my situation. Eventually I abandoned that effort and ran
>> balance without options.
> Hopefully the explanation I gave on the filters in the Github issue
> helped some. In this case though, it sounds like running a filtered
> balance probably wouldn't have saved you much over a full one.
Yes, it helped. Hugo's email helped too. I now have a better
understanding of balance filters.
At the same time, Hugo's email and others in this thread added to my
belief that I'm now managing systems with a filesystem I'm unqualified
to use.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 21:43 Recommendations for balancing as part of regular maintenance? Tom Worster
2018-01-08 22:18 ` Hugo Mills
2018-01-09 12:23 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-09 14:16 ` Tom Worster [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-08 15:55 Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-08 16:20 ` ein
2018-01-08 16:34 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-08 18:17 ` Graham Cobb
2018-01-08 18:34 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-08 20:29 ` Martin Raiber
2018-01-09 8:33 ` Marat Khalili
2018-01-09 12:46 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-10 3:49 ` Duncan
2018-01-10 16:30 ` Tom Worster
2018-01-10 17:01 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-10 18:33 ` Tom Worster
2018-01-10 20:44 ` Timofey Titovets
2018-01-11 13:00 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-11 8:51 ` Duncan
2018-01-10 4:38 ` Duncan
2018-01-10 12:41 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-11 20:12 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2018-01-10 21:37 ` waxhead
2018-01-11 12:50 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-11 19:56 ` Hans van Kranenburg
2018-01-12 18:24 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-12 19:26 ` Tom Worster
2018-01-12 19:43 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-13 22:09 ` Chris Murphy
2018-01-15 13:43 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2018-01-15 18:23 ` Tom Worster
2018-01-16 6:45 ` Chris Murphy
2018-01-16 11:02 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2018-01-16 12:57 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6A139191-C846-41DA-AE60-44115E0C17C6@thefsb.org \
--to=fsb@thefsb.org \
--cc=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.