From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:44943 "EHLO mx4-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750991AbaHLAHS convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:07:18 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: random fixes of btrfs-filesystem documentation References: <53E888C3.70807@jp.fujitsu.com> <53E8F7F0.3060300@redhat.com> <53E95703.9050705@jp.fujitsu.com> From: Eric Sandeen To: Satoru Takeuchi In-Reply-To: <53E95703.9050705@jp.fujitsu.com> Message-Id: <6DC8BDFA-32FF-4EB4-87D4-AB09F7A5A9FE@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 20:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Eric Sandeen , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Aug 11, 2014, at 4:51 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > Hi Eric, > ... > > > OK, I'll fix my patch based on your comment. > # Of course, I'll replace "(btrfs?)" with something proper words. I assumed it only scans btrfs but didn't know for sure :) > Can I add your "Signed-off-by" to my v2 patch? Oh, sure, if you use my text, that makes sense. thanks, -Eric >> >> (What seems to be missing, though, is why would the user ever choose to use '-d?') > > I'm not sure. I guess, for example, in large systems, -d takes too > many times for scanning all devices under /dev or something? > > Thank you for your comments! > > Satoru > >> >> -Eric >