All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "chaochao2021666@163.com" <chaochao2021666@163.com>
To: Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com, jagan@amarulasolutions.com,
	vigneshr@ti.com,  michael@walle.cc
Cc: chao.zeng@siemens.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
	trini@konsulko.com, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	baocheng.su@siemens.com, le.jin@siemens.com, 464759471@qq.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sf: Querying write-protect status before operating the flash
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:20:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a0f1988-73ff-9fb8-2006-e6a7374ef630@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fed36e0c-ce71-5533-ee79-04cd79eb2b62@microchip.com>

On 2021/11/15 13:57, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> + Michael
>
> On 11/15/21 4:37 AM,chaochao2021666@163.com  wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> From: chao zeng<chao.zeng@siemens.com>
>>
>> When operating the write-protection flash,spi_flash_std_write() and
>> spi_flash_std_erase() would return wrong result.The flash is protected,
>> but write or erase the flash would show "OK".
>>
>> Check the flash write protection state before operating the flash
>> and give a prompt to show it has been locked if the write-protection
>> has enbale
>>
>> Signed-off-by: chao zeng<chao.zeng@siemens.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes for V2:
>>       - Return 0 not ENOPROTOOPT to refelect the flash feature
>>       - Output prompt information
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
>> index f461082e03..995801817d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
>> @@ -109,6 +109,11 @@ static int spi_flash_std_write(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len,
>>          struct mtd_info *mtd = &flash->mtd;
>>          size_t retlen;
>>
>> +       if (flash->flash_is_locked && flash->flash_is_locked(flash, offset, len)) {
>> +               printf("SF: Flash is locked\n");
> I would use a debug message, it's a flash specific thing. Also, I would update
> a bit the message, something like
> "SF: Flash has protected areas in the requested length. Writes will be ignored on those."
>
>> +               return 0;
> Michael has suggested to drop this line. I agree with him, check the conversation
> on the previous email thread.
>
> Cheers,
> ta
>
>> +       }
>> +
>>          return mtd->_write(mtd, offset, len, &retlen, buf);
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -127,6 +132,11 @@ static int spi_flash_std_erase(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len)
>>          instr.addr = offset;
>>          instr.len = len;
>>
>> +       if (flash->flash_is_locked && flash->flash_is_locked(flash, offset, len)) {
>> +               printf("SF: Flash is locked\n");
>> +               return 0;
>> +       }
>> +
>>          return mtd->_erase(mtd, &instr);
>>   }
>>
>> --
>> 2.33.1
>>
>>

the background is we like to use sf command to operate the flash under 
uboot shell,

"sf erase" command still would show the prompt  "erase ok" even though  
write-enable has enabled.


So at the beginning  I'd like to return an error ,so the sf operation 
would show "erase failed" when operating the write-enabled devices.


I'm agree with onlyoutput information to prompt the user the operation 
unsuccessful.

But It should explicitly giveclear hints,so I suggest at here using 
printf not debug.


BRs

Chao

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-15 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-15  2:37 [PATCH v2] sf: Querying write-protect status before operating the flash chaochao2021666
2021-11-15  5:57 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2021-11-15 13:20   ` chaochao2021666 [this message]
2021-11-15 14:02     ` Jagan Teki
2021-11-15 14:18       ` Tom Rini
2021-11-15 14:49         ` Jagan Teki
2021-11-16  8:41       ` chaochao
2021-11-16 20:10         ` Tom Rini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6a0f1988-73ff-9fb8-2006-e6a7374ef630@163.com \
    --to=chaochao2021666@163.com \
    --cc=464759471@qq.com \
    --cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=baocheng.su@siemens.com \
    --cc=chao.zeng@siemens.com \
    --cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=le.jin@siemens.com \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.