From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932315AbeCNOzE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:55:04 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:58108 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751985AbeCNOzC (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:55:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/kvm: use Enlightened VMCS when running on Hyper-V To: Vitaly Kuznetsov , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Thomas Gleixner Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" , Mohammed Gamal , Cathy Avery , Bandan Das , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180309140249.2840-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180309140249.2840-8-vkuznets@redhat.com> <87r2opcr6u.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <6a5f2453-cf51-d491-db54-5f239caa29bc@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:54:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r2opcr6u.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/03/2018 15:19, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> Static key is being used to avoid performance penalty for non-Hyper-V >>> deployments. Tests show we add around 3 (three) CPU cycles on each >>> VMEXIT (1077.5 cycles before, 1080.7 cycles after for the same CPUID >>> loop on bare metal). We can probably avoid one test/jmp in vmx_vcpu_run() >>> but I don't see a clean way to use static key in assembly. >> STATIC_JUMP_IF_TRUE, STATIC_JUMP_IF_FALSE are your friends. >> > Thanks for the tip, > > with a single kernel user of these APIs it was easy to miss :-) > > Unfortunately, these APIs are only present if HAVE_JUMP_LABEL and > (afaiu) we still care about KVM on !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL builds. It would be > nice if we can make them behave the same way static_branch_likely() and > friends do: compile into something else when !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL so we can > avoid nasty #ifdefs in C code. > > That said I'd like to defer the question to KVM maintainers: Paolo, > Radim, what would you like me to do? Use STATIC_JUMP_IF_TRUE/FALSE as > they are, try to make them work for !HAVE_JUMP_LABEL and use them or > maybe we can commit the series as-is and have it as a future > optimization (e.g. when HAVE_JUMP_LABEL becomes mandatory)? With a single instruction to patch, poking at the text manually might be an option... Otherwise, it's okay as-is. Paolo