From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail001.aei.ca ([206.123.6.130]:33610 "EHLO mail001.aei.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966109AbbBCSBn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2015 13:01:43 -0500 From: Ed Tomlinson To: Forrest Liu Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix =?iso-8859-1?Q?find=5Ffree=5Fdev=5Fextent()_malfunction_in_case_device_tr?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ee_has_hole?= Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 13:01:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <6a7eaaa1-ee4b-4c8f-905c-c9b6da9ba0b8@aei.ca> In-Reply-To: References: <1422862299-7361-1-git-send-email-forrestl@synology.com> <9348c3e9-9858-4c1a-9489-fab558f1e169@aei.ca> <6ada49cc-4bf0-4a9d-8ed7-27754af3639c@aei.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, Its a great idea to test the patches before submitting. However I think its even more importent to tell us the state of testing. eg. this is an RFC or in production in abc's kernel, and this version is untested or has been compile tested, boot tested, improves xfstests (before x failures out of z, after the patch the number of failures was y, where y 2015-02-03 2:40 GMT+08:00 Ed Tomlinson : >> On Monday, February 2, 2015 9:39:06 AM EST, Ed Tomlinson wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Booting a kernel with the three patches: >> [PATCH] Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree >> has hole ... > > My fault, i should test these patches before i submit these patches. > The oops was caused by patch > "Btrfs: btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page() didn't free pages of > dummy extent" > > I will resend these patches after test on linux-3.19-rc7. > > Thanks > Forrest > >> Anyone else? >> >> Thanks >> Ed Tomlinson >> ... > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >