From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FEDC433EF for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 12:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230407AbiAOMRP (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 07:17:15 -0500 Received: from qproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.16.161]:47483 "EHLO qproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229486AbiAOMRN (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 07:17:13 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1475 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 07:17:13 EST Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by qproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B17802821F for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cmgw11.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.126]) by progateway3.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213E7100438AF for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5620.bluehost.com ([162.241.219.59]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 8hbonQZuiwm8i8hbonOphg; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:52:37 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=DpSTREz+ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61e2b585 a=30941lsx5skRcbJ0JMGu9A==:117 a=30941lsx5skRcbJ0JMGu9A==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=DghFqjY3_ZEA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=-Ou01B_BuAIA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=AP5qsahKqJmy_V8YNR8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=AjGcO6oz07-iQ99wixmX:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=w6rz.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=epW9L7ShDsKW6zsYqLXc4ia52wbxBHVIIkKtVVafelU=; b=p3RINHvPdXCZBqADT1gBZ+D4Zk hcl0DbyNrvtN/EMtUbmkX+lEz36kTlLC0yBbD+qfKsfiZtPcYtDTBB6MxG0Ky4WWCXIkVKXf253fu EQdwICTtBurfxOdMomjPIV97N; Received: from c-73-162-232-9.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([73.162.232.9]:32778 helo=[10.0.1.23]) by box5620.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1n8hbn-003OEW-L5; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 04:52:35 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/41] 5.15.15-rc1 review To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20220114081545.158363487@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ron Economos Message-ID: <6aa09e6a-9537-72d0-caf0-347038fe37b5@w6rz.net> Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:52:34 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5620.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - w6rz.net X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 73.162.232.9 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1n8hbn-003OEW-L5 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: c-73-162-232-9.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([10.0.1.23]) [73.162.232.9]:32778 X-Source-Auth: re@w6rz.net X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: d3NpeHJ6bmU7d3NpeHJ6bmU7Ym94NTYyMC5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/15/22 12:14 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:59:57AM -0800, Ron Economos wrote: >> On 1/14/22 12:16 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.15 release. >>> There are 41 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.15-rc1.gz >>> or in the git tree and branch at: >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y >>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >> Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched). >> >> Warnings: >> >> fs/jffs2/xattr.c: In function 'jffs2_build_xattr_subsystem': >> fs/jffs2/xattr.c:887:1: warning: the frame size of 1104 bytes is larger than >> 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] >>   887 | } >>       | ^ >> lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c: In function 'ladder_cmult.constprop': >> lib/crypto/curve25519-hacl64.c:601:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes >> is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] >>   601 | } >>       | ^ >> drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c: In function 'root_remove_peer_lists': >> drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c:77:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 >> bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] >>    77 | } >>       | ^ >> drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c: In function 'root_free_rcu': >> drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c:64:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 >> bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] >>    64 | } >>       | ^ >> drivers/vhost/scsi.c: In function 'vhost_scsi_flush': >> drivers/vhost/scsi.c:1444:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger >> than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] >>  1444 | } >>       | ^ > Are these new warnings with this release, or old ones? > > thanks, > > greg k-h They are old ones. Ron