From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751798AbdFTCwO (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:52:14 -0400
Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:40772 "EHLO
        smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751094AbdFTCwM (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:52:12 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E40FE60310
Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org
Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=stummala@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/list_lru.c: use cond_resched_lock() for nlru->lock
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Polakov <apolyakov@beget.ru>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1497228440-10349-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
 <20170615140523.76f8fc3ca21dae3704f06a56@linux-foundation.org>
 <20170617111431.GA27061@esperanza>
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <6ab790fe-de97-9495-0d3b-804bae5d7fbb@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:22:01 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170617111431.GA27061@esperanza>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hello,

On 6/17/2017 4:44 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:

>
> That said, I think it would be better to patch shrink_dcache_sb() or
> dentry_lru_isolate_shrink() instead of list_lru_walk() in order to fix
> this lockup.

Thanks for the review. I will enhance the patch as per your suggestion.

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/list_lru.c: use cond_resched_lock() for nlru->lock
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Polakov <apolyakov@beget.ru>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
 linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1497228440-10349-1-git-send-email-stummala@codeaurora.org>
 <20170615140523.76f8fc3ca21dae3704f06a56@linux-foundation.org>
 <20170617111431.GA27061@esperanza>
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <6ab790fe-de97-9495-0d3b-804bae5d7fbb@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:22:01 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170617111431.GA27061@esperanza>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hello,

On 6/17/2017 4:44 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:

>
> That said, I think it would be better to patch shrink_dcache_sb() or
> dentry_lru_isolate_shrink() instead of list_lru_walk() in order to fix
> this lockup.

Thanks for the review. I will enhance the patch as per your suggestion.

-- 
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>