From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0FC47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34A361278 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:32:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B34A361278 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=oktetlabs.ru Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FC340689; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:32:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from shelob.oktetlabs.ru (shelob.oktetlabs.ru [91.220.146.113]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7D84067A for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:32:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (aros.oktetlabs.ru [192.168.38.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shelob.oktetlabs.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EEBE7F4FE; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:32:12 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 shelob.oktetlabs.ru 3EEBE7F4FE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=oktetlabs.ru; s=default; t=1623169932; bh=J7x9KOd3G2+wBJladNwvqnx60eJIB2oZRvUIzREc3W0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=SBumivgPocntcwPKVTdP1xQ73FHJs1/PUrS1SYw5MobhZwA/mF2ujroo3kk5+jStk UvLbIQlbwsPQmxgUn4ZJyvidezo8Pm4WSXxQ2OHUtYf9QY0rC+QZ2/iwVzZmvBTrNQ /l5ww6mw06ia1o3bUlENru2qqR9o+e7RuPY4Xt2I= To: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org Cc: Ilya Maximets , Ori Kam , Ivan Malov , Eli Britstein , Smadar Fuks , Hyong Youb Kim , Kishore Padmanabha , Ajit Khaparde , Jerin Jacob , John Daley , Ferruh Yigit , olivier.matz@6wind.com, shahafs@nvidia.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, Rony Efraim References: <20210601111420.5549-1-ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru> <16072371.opfqJCapsB@thomas> <2439442.dE1UY4tsTa@thomas> From: Andrew Rybchenko Organization: OKTET Labs Message-ID: <6bfdce5d-ef9b-6187-838d-af22c82b1196@oktetlabs.ru> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 19:32:12 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2439442.dE1UY4tsTa@thomas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ethdev: clarify flow action PORT ID semantics X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 6/8/21 7:13 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 07/06/2021 18:07, Thomas Monjalon: >> 07/06/2021 15:21, Ilya Maximets: >>> On 6/7/21 2:08 PM, Ori Kam wrote: >>>> From: Andrew Rybchenko >>>>> On 6/7/21 11:28 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>>>>> I see emails don't work well to conclude on how to manage representors. >>>>>> I propose working in live meetings so we can try to align our views on >>>>>> a virtual whiteboard and interactively ask questions. >>>>>> Participants in those meetings could work on documenting what is the >>>>>> view of a representor as a first step. >>>>>> Second step, it should be easier to discuss the API. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you agree, I will plan a first meeting where we can discuss what is >>>>>> a representor in our opinions. >>>>>> The meeting time would be 4pm UTC. >>>>>> For the day, I would propose this Thursday 10 if it works for >>>>>> everybody involved. >>> >>> Second half of the day (CET) is pretty much booked in my calendar. Tuesday >>> or Wednesday might work on this week. Wednesday or Thursday might work on >>> next week. >>> >>>>> OK for me. >>>> O.K. for me too. >> >> OK let's decide with a poll please: >> https://framadate.org/PAP3t8ycqx3lEUfe > > Only 5 people voting. > We will be at least 4 tomorrow Wednesday 3pm UTC. > Everybody is welcome to join the community meeting: > https://zoom.us/j/93391811485 Invite has July, 7. Typo? > We could try another session on Thursday 4pm UTC if needed. > https://zoom.us/j/92425132629 > > Note: we will use Zoom which offers a whiteboard. >