* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2021-05-20 21:43 ` Shuah Khan
2021-05-20 22:54 ` Guenter Roeck
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2021-05-20 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Shuah Khan
On 5/20/21 9:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.39-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-20 21:43 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2021-05-20 22:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-05-21 4:25 ` Florian Fainelli
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2021-05-20 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 455 pass: 455 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-05-20 21:43 ` Shuah Khan
2021-05-20 22:54 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2021-05-21 4:25 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-05-21 5:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2021-05-21 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
jonathanh, stable
On 5/20/2021 8:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.39-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-21 4:25 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2021-05-21 5:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
2021-05-21 9:05 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2021-05-21 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, Florian Fainelli, patches, lkft-triage,
Jon Hunter, linux-stable, Pavel Machek, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 20:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.39-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
## Build
* kernel: 5.10.39-rc2
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git branch: linux-5.10.y
* git commit: 4313768a0a3ef0847c2ca31ca95acbe4727fba10
* git describe: v5.10.38-46-g4313768a0a3e
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.38-46-g4313768a0a3e
## No regressions (compared to v5.10.38-48-ge244ebb2de00)
## No fixes (compared to v5.10.38-48-ge244ebb2de00)
## Test result summary
total: 78427, pass: 64145, fail: 2569, skip: 11054, xfail: 659,
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 193 total, 193 passed, 0 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* i386: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* juno-r2: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 45 total, 45 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 21 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* x15: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86: 1 total, 1 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 27 passed, 0 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest-
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-bpf
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-lkdtm
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native-
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none-
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* rcutorture
* ssuite
* v4l2-compliance
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-21 5:08 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2021-05-21 9:05 ` Jon Hunter
2021-05-21 12:05 ` Fox Chen
2021-05-21 18:19 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2021-05-21 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, linux-tegra
On Thu, 20 May 2021 17:23:18 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.39-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.10:
12 builds: 12 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
70 tests: 70 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.10.39-rc2-g4313768a0a3e
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* RE: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-21 9:05 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2021-05-21 12:05 ` Fox Chen
2021-05-21 18:19 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Fox Chen @ 2021-05-21 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable, Fox Chen
On Thu, 20 May 2021 17:23:18 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.39-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
5.10.39-rc2 Successfully Compiled and booted on my Raspberry PI 4b (8g) (bcm2711)
Tested-by: Fox Chen <foxhlchen@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review
2021-05-20 15:23 [PATCH 5.10 00/45] 5.10.39-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-21 12:05 ` Fox Chen
@ 2021-05-21 18:19 ` Sudip Mukherjee
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2021-05-21 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, stable
Hi Greg,
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:23:18PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.39 release.
> There are 45 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 22 May 2021 15:22:29 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 63 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.1.1 20210430): 105 configs -> no new failure
x86_64 (gcc version 10.2.1 20210110): 2 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression.
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread