From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Agner Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 0/3] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:15:57 -0700 Message-ID: <6c896634c4d6446df0388da2c0228232@agner.ch> References: <20141009151605.GA8818@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1412950949-7505-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail.kmu-office.ch ([178.209.48.109]:51385 "EHLO mail.kmu-office.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753046AbcIHWVU (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 18:21:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1412950949-7505-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?= Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Sascha Hauer , Thierry Reding , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Guo Hi Lothar, On 2014-10-10 07:22, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > This patch series adds support for polarity inversion to the pwm-imx > driver. The patches have been tested on i.MX6, i.MX53 and with the > ti-ehrpwm.c driver. Do you know what prevented this patchset from getting merged? We are looking for Polarity support in PWM for too, this is especially useful for backlight control. -- Stefan > > Changes wrt. v2: > - make the use of '#pwm-cells = <3>' optional, so that the change does > not break existing DT blobs as suggested by Arnd Bergmann and Sascha > Hauer. > > Changes wrt. v3: > - implemented the approach suggested by Sascha Hauer > - don't modify struct pwm_ops in the imx_pwm probe function > > Changes wrt. v4: > - rebased onto current linux-next > - dropped cleanup patch which is not necessary any more > - resent with ACK from Shawn Guo and Reviewed-By tag from Sascha Hauer > > Changes wrt. v5: > - don't remove of_pwm_n_cells to keep sanity checks for #pwm-cells as > suggested by Thierry Reding > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stefan@agner.ch (Stefan Agner) Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:15:57 -0700 Subject: [PATCHv6 0/3] pwm: imx: support output polarity inversion In-Reply-To: <1412950949-7505-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> References: <20141009151605.GA8818@ulmo.nvidia.com> <1412950949-7505-1-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> Message-ID: <6c896634c4d6446df0388da2c0228232@agner.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Lothar, On 2014-10-10 07:22, Lothar Wa?mann wrote: > This patch series adds support for polarity inversion to the pwm-imx > driver. The patches have been tested on i.MX6, i.MX53 and with the > ti-ehrpwm.c driver. Do you know what prevented this patchset from getting merged? We are looking for Polarity support in PWM for too, this is especially useful for backlight control. -- Stefan > > Changes wrt. v2: > - make the use of '#pwm-cells = <3>' optional, so that the change does > not break existing DT blobs as suggested by Arnd Bergmann and Sascha > Hauer. > > Changes wrt. v3: > - implemented the approach suggested by Sascha Hauer > - don't modify struct pwm_ops in the imx_pwm probe function > > Changes wrt. v4: > - rebased onto current linux-next > - dropped cleanup patch which is not necessary any more > - resent with ACK from Shawn Guo and Reviewed-By tag from Sascha Hauer > > Changes wrt. v5: > - don't remove of_pwm_n_cells to keep sanity checks for #pwm-cells as > suggested by Thierry Reding > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel