All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build results for 2021-03-03
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:56:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6cb4a8d7-bee8-5712-2cac-1259d01e288e@benettiengineering.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304224926.45aa4056@windsurf.home>

Hi Thomas, All,

On 3/4/21 10:49 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Giulio, Heiko, Thomas DS there are specific questions for you below!
> 
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 08:15:14 -0000
> Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com> wrote:
> 
>>     nios2     |        asterisk-16.14.1        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/24c0a6ca3b272711a1e6ceaa033925182d0d49c4
> 
> Some wonderful compiler issue.
> 
> utf8.c: In function 'ast_utf8_copy_string':
> utf8.c:157:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> 
> Giulio, does this look like a known NIOS2 issue ?

Yes, I've filed it time ago here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93847

Then maintainer wanted me to provide all pre-preprocessed files and all 
build flags. There the issue was showing using Codesourcery only, but 
here we have a Buildroot toolchain, so better chance to dig.

Anyway I can add patches to add the _BUG_ and use the -O0 workaround. 
What about that?

> 
>>     nios2     |        belle-sip-4.4.8         | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/71f26fd81db8e9b19b3f18f3f3cefd9c768f094f |
> 
> /tmp/ccDtjRfo.s: Assembler messages:
> /tmp/ccDtjRfo.s:210798: Error: branch offset out of range
> 
> Another wonderful nios2 toolchain issue. Giulio, what do you think ?

This is new to me, I've checked on Gcc Bugzilla and it doesn't seem to 
be there. So I can file it up and look for a workaround, maybe the usual 
-O0.

> 
>>      arc      |         dc3dd-7.2.641          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/4829278085da2409bb2902161f9984708411166a | ORPH
>>      arc      |         dc3dd-7.2.641          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/3b145a99a1f7498ee7fcd445f3cc319f548e9a81 | ORPH
>>      arc      |         dc3dd-7.2.641          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/c1cb2dd0b9e7547f3858e62281da3bd45b9a5b17 | ORPH
> 
> verify.h:132:30: error: negative width in bit-field 'verify_error_if_negative_size__'
>    132 |       (struct { unsigned int verify_error_if_negative_size__: (R) ? 1 : -1; }))
> 
> This happens on RISC-V 32-bit, and on ARC, but only with internal
> toolchains. The assertion that breaks is:
> 
>    116 | verify (LONG_MIN <= TYPE_MINIMUM (time_t) && TYPE_MAXIMUM (time_t) <= LONG_MAX);
> 
> So to me, it smells like another instance of "this is a 32-bit
> architecture, but time_t is 64-bit, and this breaks some userspace code
> that makes bogus assumptions on the size of time_t".
> 
> This feels similar to the libopenssl situation for which Yann has just
> sent a patch. Should we have a BR2_ARCH_IS_32_BUT_TIME_T_IS_64 boolean ?
> 
>>     sparc     |          dhcpcd-9.4.0          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/fba538d2ae4a1c53440ed73ced4023be27d7e9c2 |
> 
> I assume this is fixed by https://git.buildroot.org/buildroot/commit/?id=e5594f7239547672c08058b77f8098d2c080bebc
> 
>>    riscv64    |      fuse-overlayfs-1.4.0      | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/cfef18f3adf51edaedbbd193efbff19aebdfe508 |
> 
> This is a bug in uClibc: it implements renameat() only if the
> SYS_renameat system call exists. If only the SYS_renameat2 system call
> exists, the renameat() function is not implemented. Musl does this
> correctly:
> 
> int renameat(int oldfd, const char *old, int newfd, const char *new)
> {
> #ifdef SYS_renameat
>          return syscall(SYS_renameat, oldfd, old, newfd, new);
> #else
>          return syscall(SYS_renameat2, oldfd, old, newfd, new, 0);
> #endif
> }
> 
> uclibc needs to be patched here.
> 
>>    mips64el   |      gstreamer1-mm-1.10.0      | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b1c5989a3a09b39e504c21201e3e07c0afc2a1ea | ORPH
> 
> /home/buildroot/autobuild/instance-2/output-1/host/bin/../mips64el-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gatomic.h:97:5: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind static_assert
> 
> This messages comes from deep down gcc, when compiling the gatomic.h
> macros. It happens on all MIPS architecture variants.
> 
>>    aarch64    |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/739d625673f9b2ce2d915ecdc21910c62618d145 |
>> microblazeel |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b1779a7d46f6ee9c06864c3ca252f1cdad47cf08 |
>>      i586     |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a5fe402e3f4e538eb4584f345b029ef12ad43348 |
>>      arc      |     host-sentry-cli-1.57.0     | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/abd3f886335f146ff6f16370484106bd8a205bda |
> 
> What do we do with this? The only way to solve that is to have the
> Cargo vendoring support, which we won't have for 2021.02. Should we
> drop this package ?
> 
>>      arc      |       kismet-2020-12-R3        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1c2885d75219aabadbb66ab66fe0dc4b4346ff1e | ORPH
>>      i586     |       kismet-2020-12-R3        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/3a76afdbd8b564579bfb08a4d75b438dbd73ac2e | ORPH
> 
> Would be fixed by https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20210304200430.1749334-1-fontaine.fabrice at gmail.com/
> 
>>   powerpc64   | kvm-unit-tests-kvm-unit-tes... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/06cce5030766fcc789f0ba4a76d2cbaa091300d0 |
> 
> /home/giuliobenetti/autobuild/run/instance-1/output-1/host/bin/powerpc64-linux-ld: powerpc/spapr_hcall.elf: error: PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment
> 
> kvm-unit-tests has always been a bit complicated as it builds some kind
> of bare-metal code. I would simply suggest that we drop powerpc64 from
> the list of supported CPU architectures for this package.
> 
>>     nios2     |         libgeos-3.9.0          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a05fdf1958f93a206c5c66c7f636b6650683626d | ORPH
> 
> Some more nios2 toolchain issue.

This is very similar to one of Microblaze gcc bugs. So I could be able 
to workaround it with the same -O0.

> Should we get rid of nios2 support entirely ?

Here it seems we get to the same point of Microblaze, if there is no 
hurry I can provide patches to save Nios the same way I've done for 
Microblaze.

>>     mipsel    |       libopenh264-2.1.1        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/26837f7c80a84e5ad31d5b15161848ebecc59917 |
> 
> This is happening since we have added the use of the Bootlin mips32
> toolchain early February:
> http://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=libopenh264-2.1.1
> 
> Needs investigation to see if this is a toolchain issue, or a package
> issue that wasn't noticed until now.
> 
>>    riscv32    |       libopenssl-1.1.1j        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/e7bf5db7745c56c4533c225260ff6c3fcd2000f5 |
>>    riscv32    |       libopenssl-1.1.1j        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/5b4834023eca039be59b969e3037bb23feeed6ac |
> 
> Being worked on by Yann.
> 
>>    riscv64    |        libostree-2020.8        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d42bce7ef9cf0f807b9ba7021af4a11f84e307d2 |
> 
> Ah another instance of renameat() missing from uClibc.
> 
>>   powerpc64   |        netopeer2-1.1.53        | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/49efc0e93ad8fe30e5f32fed8a1efc1d2afd830e |
> 
> -- Installing missing sysrepo modules...
> [ERR]: Retrieving GID "8000" grp entry failed (No such GID).
> sysrepoctl error: Failed to connect (Item not found)
> [ERR]: Retrieving GID "8000" grp entry failed (No such GID).
> sysrepoctl error: Failed to connect (Item not found)
> CMake Error at cmake_install.cmake:77 (message):
>     scripts/setup.sh failed: 1
> 
> Ah this seems like netopeer2's build system is looking at the host too
> much ?
> 
> Heiko ?
> 
>>     x86_64    |         openblas-0.3.9         | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d530db0f37e1e0462e3af1e1787e15f94ff21884 | ORPH
> 
> /home/giuliobenetti/autobuild/run/instance-3/output-1/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/9.3.0/../../../../x86_64-buildroot-linux-musl/bin/ld: ../libopenblas_nehalem-r0.3.9.a(sbdsvdx.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
> 
> Thomas DS, you are now our expert in openblas. Could you have a look ?
> 
>>    aarch64    |         rt-tests-1.10          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/c6a3cdd4a07f8918b164e0e1e85c92d8b14ec228 |
> 
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/buildroot/autobuild/run/instance-2/output-1/build/rt-tests-1.10'
> Makefile:41: *** commands commence before first target.  Stop.
> 
> During the installation step. This shouldn't be too difficult to
> reproduce and track down?
> 
>>     xtensa    |          strace-5.10           | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/6c679877e1a3f50d5e0bc4db3237e0c699bd7243 |
> 
> ./linux/xtensa/arch_regs.c:10:32: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct user_pt_regs'
> 
> Some more pt_regs fun on a funky architecture. Oh dear.
> 
>>     sparc     |            tio-1.32            | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/7cbace3ce72bbcce8ef36f71cba8071bfda9fc26 |
>>    sparc64    |            tio-1.32            | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b9a671c46fa41875c1fd6a16790b314c16ef989b |
> 
> This would be worked around by disabling the package on sparc/sparc64,
> which has been proposed a long time ago already:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20201025163457.30460-1-sergio.prado at e-labworks.com/
> 
>>      arm      | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/d9b9a4b7c3660bd730a19ab09e44f24bc29e3f40 | ORPH
>>      arm      | toolchain-external-linaro-a... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/13f9a551f5ac911e7daa2a382b0683d81486cffa | ORPH
> 
> toolchain is gone ?

Here it's Micronova firewall that blocks it, I've just written to my IT.

> 
>>    powerpc    |            unknown             | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/159d2c07060c235080711d1d0da0b2eae995d4bf |
> 
> This is a top-level parallel build issue... but since we don't have the
> full log, we don't have the error.
> 
> Should we perhaps keep the full log, compressed, for builds done in
> parallel ?

I see it's on my Autobuilder, what can I do to provide suck full log? Do 
you mean the entire Buildroot log? If yes I can try to reproduce it and 
save it on a file and post it in some way.

>>      or1k     |          zeromq-4.3.4          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ed105d321c0bde99c293ab7328d57c3764db6f27 |
>>      or1k     |          zeromq-4.3.4          | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/ce351e0e97c2cacc17d4718d39941548c7558559 |
> 
> /home/giuliobenetti/autobuild/run/instance-1/output-1/host/opt/ext-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/9.3.0/../../../../or1k-buildroot-linux-uclibc/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.33.1 assertion fail elf32-or1k.c:2329
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> 
> Giulio, is this a known or1k issue ?

Yes, for this I've sent a patchset time ago:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/list/?series=161548

So basically zeromq should be disabled like protobuf. But need to check it.

You've also answered me here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20200228175814.128730-1-giulio.benetti at benettiengineering.com/

Here it seems the same situation as Nios and Microblaze.

For this I can provide patches too if not in hurry.

Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-05  7:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  8:15 [Buildroot] [autobuild.buildroot.net] Daily results for 2021-03-03 Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 21:49 ` [Buildroot] Analysis of build " Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-04 22:26   ` Yann E. MORIN
2021-03-05  8:01     ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  8:36     ` Peter Korsgaard
2021-03-05  7:56   ` Giulio Benetti [this message]
2021-03-05  8:55     ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:13       ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:22     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 16:01       ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:13         ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05 16:52           ` Giulio Benetti
2021-03-05  9:48   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2021-03-05 15:10   ` Heiko Thiery
2021-03-05 15:14     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2021-03-05 15:38       ` Heiko Thiery

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6cb4a8d7-bee8-5712-2cac-1259d01e288e@benettiengineering.com \
    --to=giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.