From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 11:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6d7ba1e5-5da0-f2ea-bc73-c6b04a055a9b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170207215217.GG31091@potion>
On 07/02/2017 22:52, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> there might be some rough
> edges with nested, but it was broken even before, and they fix at least
> one known bug.
I don't think so, nested IRQ injection is tested very well. Why do you
say it was broken even before?
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-08 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-19 16:17 [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-19 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: vmx: clear pending interrupts on KVM_SET_LAPIC Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 17:42 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-12-19 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] kvm: nVMX: move nested events check to kvm_vcpu_running Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 18:16 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-12-19 16:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: x86: preparatory changes for APICv cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 18:20 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-12-19 16:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: vmx: move sync_pir_to_irr from apic_find_highest_irr to callers Paolo Bonzini
2016-12-19 16:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice on APICv vmentry Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 20:19 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-07 21:49 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-08 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-08 14:24 ` Radim Krčmář
2016-12-19 16:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv interrupt injection Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 19:58 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-08 16:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-09 15:11 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-03-09 1:23 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-09 9:40 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-09 10:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] KVM: x86: cleanup and speedup for APICv Paolo Bonzini
2017-02-07 21:52 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-08 10:04 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-02-08 13:33 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-02-08 15:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6d7ba1e5-5da0-f2ea-bc73-c6b04a055a9b@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.