From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/11] net: dsa: Move FDB dump implementation
 inside DSA
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 15:00:39 +0300
Message-ID: <6da16295-facd-cc14-12a4-e91d62202695@mellanox.com>
References: <1500387624-4361-1-git-send-email-arkadis@mellanox.com>
 <1500387624-4361-10-git-send-email-arkadis@mellanox.com>
 <877ez5boxj.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com,
        stephen@networkplumber.org, mlxsw@mellanox.com
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-eopbgr40057.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([40.107.4.57]:12758
        "EHLO EUR03-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751448AbdGSMAt (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 19 Jul 2017 08:00:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877ez5boxj.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>



On 07/18/2017 09:06 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Arkadi,
> 
> Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@mellanox.com> writes:
> 
>> +typedef int dsa_fdb_dump_cb_t(const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>> +			      u16 ndm_state, void *data);
> 
> Can I ask you to change u16 ndm_state for bool is_static at the same
> time? Ethernet switches do not need to report more than that.
>

Will fix, thanks.

>> +static int
>> +dsa_slave_port_fdb_do_dump(const unsigned char *addr, u16 vid,
>> +			   u16 ndm_state, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct dsa_slave_dump_ctx *dump = data;
>> +	u32 portid = NETLINK_CB(dump->cb->skb).portid;
>> +	u32 seq = dump->cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
>> +	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
>> +	struct ndmsg *ndm;
>> +
>> +	if (dump->idx < dump->cb->args[2])
>> +		goto skip;
>> +
>> +	nlh = nlmsg_put(dump->skb, portid, seq, RTM_NEWNEIGH,
>> +			sizeof(*ndm), NLM_F_MULTI);
>> +	if (!nlh)
>> +		return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> +	ndm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
>> +	ndm->ndm_family  = AF_BRIDGE;
>> +	ndm->ndm_pad1    = 0;
>> +	ndm->ndm_pad2    = 0;
>> +	ndm->ndm_flags   = NTF_SELF;
>> +	ndm->ndm_type    = 0;
>> +	ndm->ndm_ifindex = dump->dev->ifindex;
>> +	ndm->ndm_state   = ndm_state;
> 
> So we can simply scope this here:
> 
>         ndm->ndm_state = is_static ? NUD_NOARP : NUD_REACHABLE;
> 
>> +
>> +	if (nla_put(dump->skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, addr))
>> +		goto nla_put_failure;
>> +
>> +	if (vid && nla_put_u16(dump->skb, NDA_VLAN, vid))
>> +		goto nla_put_failure;
>> +
>> +	nlmsg_end(dump->skb, nlh);
>> +
>> +skip:
>> +	dump->idx++;
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +nla_put_failure:
>> +	nlmsg_cancel(dump->skb, nlh);
>> +	return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +}
> 
> Other than that, LGTM.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         Vivien
>