All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
To: "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>
Cc: "Kangjie Lu" <kjlu@umn.edu>,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alessandro Zummo" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Fix memleak in sun6i_rtc_clk_init
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:55:14 +0800 (GMT+08:00)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6de4a430.8e03.17429fa786d.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v640zTha1tzjOo3L+=T=N3hDRG+8qf2xu+bD8BMUnkhORQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
> >
> > When clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy() fails,
> > clk_data should be freed. It's the same for the subsequent
> > error paths.
> 
> I suppose you should also unregister the already registered clocks
> in the latter two error paths?
> 

Sounds reasonable. But I find that the existing kernel code takes different
strategies for this case. of_sama5d4_sckc_setup() uses clk_hw_unregister() 
after clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(), while _of_fixed_clk_setup()
uses clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(). But at91sam926x_pmc_setup() just does
nothing in this case.

Also, tcon_ch1_setup() uses clk_unregister() after clk_register(), while
clk_register_vco_pll() just does nothing. 

So I'm not sure if we should register here and which unregister function to 
use. Would you please give me more specific advice about this problem?

Regards,
Dinghao

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn
To: "Chen-Yu Tsai" <wens@csie.org>
Cc: linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Fix memleak in sun6i_rtc_clk_init
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:55:14 +0800 (GMT+08:00)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6de4a430.8e03.17429fa786d.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v640zTha1tzjOo3L+=T=N3hDRG+8qf2xu+bD8BMUnkhORQ@mail.gmail.com>

> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 3:59 PM Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> wrote:
> >
> > When clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy() fails,
> > clk_data should be freed. It's the same for the subsequent
> > error paths.
> 
> I suppose you should also unregister the already registered clocks
> in the latter two error paths?
> 

Sounds reasonable. But I find that the existing kernel code takes different
strategies for this case. of_sama5d4_sckc_setup() uses clk_hw_unregister() 
after clk_hw_register_fixed_rate_with_accuracy(), while _of_fixed_clk_setup()
uses clk_hw_unregister_fixed_rate(). But at91sam926x_pmc_setup() just does
nothing in this case.

Also, tcon_ch1_setup() uses clk_unregister() after clk_register(), while
clk_register_vco_pll() just does nothing. 

So I'm not sure if we should register here and which unregister function to 
use. Would you please give me more specific advice about this problem?

Regards,
Dinghao
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-23  7:58 Dinghao Liu
2020-08-23  7:58 ` Dinghao Liu
2020-08-25 14:51 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-08-25 14:51   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2020-08-26  8:55   ` dinghao.liu [this message]
2020-08-26  8:55     ` dinghao.liu
2020-10-09 20:57     ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-10-09 20:57       ` Alexandre Belloni
2020-10-18  6:00       ` dinghao.liu
2020-10-18  6:00         ` dinghao.liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6de4a430.8e03.17429fa786d.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn \
    --to=dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --subject='Re: Re: [PATCH] rtc: sun6i: Fix memleak in sun6i_rtc_clk_init' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.