From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC30C433B4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEC06162E for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230333AbhEKBbf (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 21:31:35 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:2761 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229920AbhEKBbd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 21:31:33 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FfKyx2KKCzmg1X; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:27:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:30:22 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: set file as cold when file defragmentation To: Jaegeuk Kim CC: , "chao@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" References: <20210429062005epcms2p352ef77f96ab66cbffe0c0ab6c1b62d8a@epcms2p3> <3a0ab201-9546-d523-abc7-79df5f637f14@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <6e95edca-4802-7650-4771-5389067935dc@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:30:21 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/5/10 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2021/5/6 12:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote: >>>>> In file defragmentation by ioctl, all data blocks in the file are >>>>> re-written out-of-place. File defragmentation implies user will not update >>>>> and mostly read the file. So before the defragmentation, we set file >>>>> temperature as cold for better block allocation. >>>> >>>> I don't think all fragmented files are cold, e.g. db file. >>> >>> I have a bit different opinion. I think one example would be users want to >>> defragment a file, when the they want to get higher read bandwidth for >> >> Multimedia file was already defined as cold file now via default extension >> list? > > I just gave an example. And default is default. > >> >>> usually multimedia files. That's likely to be cold files. Moreover, I don't >>> think they want to defragment db files which will be fragmented soon? >> >> I guess like db files have less update but more access? > > I think both, and we set it as hot. Then hot and cold bit will set to the same db file after defragmentation? Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> We have separated interface (via f2fs_xattr_advise_handler, e.g. setfattr -n >>>> "system.advise" -v value) to indicate this file is a hot/cold file, so my >>>> suggestion is after file defragmentation, if you think this file is cold, and >>>> use setxattr() to set it as cold. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park >>>>> --- >>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>> index d697c8900fa7..dcac965a05fe 100644 >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>> @@ -2669,6 +2669,9 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>>> map.m_len = pg_end - pg_start; >>>>> total = 0; >>>>> + if (!file_is_cold(inode)) >>>>> + file_set_cold(inode); >>>>> + >>>>> while (map.m_lblk < pg_end) { >>>>> pgoff_t idx; >>>>> int cnt = 0; >>>>> >>> . >>> > . > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B53EC433B4 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1CC61629 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BB1CC61629 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1lgHEa-0007qk-QF; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:52 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1lgHEP-0007qC-TM for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:41 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fJmsx/AB2ENMXxE6ja6cSm4Ny0xBDxq82ujJ/KhItd8=; b=DYnFiQc/Pos2Wi7o+my9uktDN8 kytG6mpq+8P4CPULPer7MCNUli9XoHghqdljV8K9qZrqo0lrLNg0H+6qR1ypB8nAPQzyqgZw1drvU mvCOmVSij21n+GrsUalb1vWnbqfkz+yySEfrFEP6KcFpSKy8e52BHw+oz8/OFvlBWKe4=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:CC:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fJmsx/AB2ENMXxE6ja6cSm4Ny0xBDxq82ujJ/KhItd8=; b=ADE27ukjbsCZ4NGby3efX9KTuK oWtSQH95kYWaLmtaB83dGeAUU7tM33CfBnxyVA06tyYXclk0IvaJVAuQQ8nRK8X9POwqGxBgcgmF4 6LHm2ziZy0L9jEU/mEgcPQZ5nHG0MUT3V8bFndPc/avFkguz/lovvlNGLJYGHjWWOsFE=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) id 1lgHEG-0001iB-G2 for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 11 May 2021 01:30:41 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FfKyx2KKCzmg1X; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:27:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.136.110.154] (10.136.110.154) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.498.0; Tue, 11 May 2021 09:30:22 +0800 To: Jaegeuk Kim References: <20210429062005epcms2p352ef77f96ab66cbffe0c0ab6c1b62d8a@epcms2p3> <3a0ab201-9546-d523-abc7-79df5f637f14@huawei.com> From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <6e95edca-4802-7650-4771-5389067935dc@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 09:30:21 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.136.110.154] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1lgHEG-0001iB-G2 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: set file as cold when file defragmentation X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2021/5/10 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2021/5/6 12:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 05/06, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2021/4/29 14:20, Daejun Park wrote: >>>>> In file defragmentation by ioctl, all data blocks in the file are >>>>> re-written out-of-place. File defragmentation implies user will not update >>>>> and mostly read the file. So before the defragmentation, we set file >>>>> temperature as cold for better block allocation. >>>> >>>> I don't think all fragmented files are cold, e.g. db file. >>> >>> I have a bit different opinion. I think one example would be users want to >>> defragment a file, when the they want to get higher read bandwidth for >> >> Multimedia file was already defined as cold file now via default extension >> list? > > I just gave an example. And default is default. > >> >>> usually multimedia files. That's likely to be cold files. Moreover, I don't >>> think they want to defragment db files which will be fragmented soon? >> >> I guess like db files have less update but more access? > > I think both, and we set it as hot. Then hot and cold bit will set to the same db file after defragmentation? Thanks, > >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> We have separated interface (via f2fs_xattr_advise_handler, e.g. setfattr -n >>>> "system.advise" -v value) to indicate this file is a hot/cold file, so my >>>> suggestion is after file defragmentation, if you think this file is cold, and >>>> use setxattr() to set it as cold. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park >>>>> --- >>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 3 +++ >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>> index d697c8900fa7..dcac965a05fe 100644 >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c >>>>> @@ -2669,6 +2669,9 @@ static int f2fs_defragment_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>>> map.m_len = pg_end - pg_start; >>>>> total = 0; >>>>> + if (!file_is_cold(inode)) >>>>> + file_set_cold(inode); >>>>> + >>>>> while (map.m_lblk < pg_end) { >>>>> pgoff_t idx; >>>>> int cnt = 0; >>>>> >>> . >>> > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel