On 9/5/18 9:52 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> A recent binutils patch added the LDGOLD variable but its already used
> for controlling EXTRA_OECONF options for gold. Separate the two variables
> to different names to avoid build warnings and confusion.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> ---
>  meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> index b56fcd4cd01..81ecbb50cc1 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc
> @@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ FILES_${PN}-dev = " \
>  # Rather than duplicating multiple entries for these, make one
>  # list and reuse it.
>  
> -LDGOLD ?= "ld.gold dwp"
> -LDGOLD_riscv64 = ""
> +LDGOLD_ALTS ?= "ld.gold dwp"
> +LDGOLD_ALTS_riscv64 = ""
>  
>  USE_ALTERNATIVES_FOR = " \
>  	addr2line \
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ USE_ALTERNATIVES_FOR = " \
>  	gprof \
>  	ld \
>  	ld.bfd \
> -	${LDGOLD} \
> +	${LDGOLD_ALTS} \

aw my bad. Thanks for taking care of it.

>  	nm \
>  	objcopy \
>  	objdump \
>