From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1516CA9EA0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6B921D7B for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2408668AbfJYJH6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:07:58 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:5183 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2408378AbfJYJH6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:07:58 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 74C9F518B207AD6D61CF; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:07:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:07:51 +0800 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support data compression References: <20191022171602.93637-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20191022171602.93637-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20191023052447.GD361298@sol.localdomain> CC: Jaegeuk Kim , , To: Eric Biggers From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <6fec84e8-82f2-aedc-9149-22ad501a08d3@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:07:49 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191023052447.GD361298@sol.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/10/23 13:24, Eric Biggers wrote: > How was this tested? Shouldn't there a mount option analogous to This should be a pre-RFC version..., I only didn't simple test on it, will do more later with combination of other features. Thanks, From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9938BCA9EA0 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69A6521929; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:08:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sourceforge.net header.i=@sourceforge.net header.b="KKZJnq5R"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sf.net header.i=@sf.net header.b="lZkd7WHP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 69A6521929 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNvZm-0006TL-Kc; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:08:06 +0000 Received: from [172.30.20.202] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNvZk-0006T9-Rc for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:08:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:To:CC:References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GBjav6SR2bU55JWA338BF4dfi0uf+nT6lrYjTxmbQuc=; b=KKZJnq5Rw+G5+cwnDahqTOPZbS nkplto1oIyki2jabvBTJMuir9H7BMbMLC8rij9TWJ5nXm36DPukn0Ay1adcFsrM8EYDIkfSojt+gm hYdqAfbg3tcGJC01YO91m02WgBtr78xCLGLTrMzFzvyonp+G+YSpnV0VBNt7yybaj/V0=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:To:CC:References:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GBjav6SR2bU55JWA338BF4dfi0uf+nT6lrYjTxmbQuc=; b=lZkd7WHPCz9oQ7JRan1Ym69Bjc TPpo3O1VdlwKWnLy27UoggqLnPhkcjd06KthLQkHjz9ronBBRlV9HErGkB3rgRJAzNHutbpA22NzM lvyGB4AdluUlLwTpTIbd34X7hKThAigAwdnfCjMzw9zRJV0Y8iHs3B4e9GyaPXc8MaVA=; Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190] helo=huawei.com) by sfi-mx-1.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.2) id 1iNvZi-00GYNW-Tj for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:08:04 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 74C9F518B207AD6D61CF; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:07:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.134.22.195] (10.134.22.195) by smtp.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:07:51 +0800 References: <20191022171602.93637-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20191022171602.93637-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20191023052447.GD361298@sol.localdomain> To: Eric Biggers From: Chao Yu Message-ID: <6fec84e8-82f2-aedc-9149-22ad501a08d3@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 17:07:49 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191023052447.GD361298@sol.localdomain> Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.134.22.195] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Headers-End: 1iNvZi-00GYNW-Tj Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support data compression X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jaegeuk Kim , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On 2019/10/23 13:24, Eric Biggers wrote: > How was this tested? Shouldn't there a mount option analogous to This should be a pre-RFC version..., I only didn't simple test on it, will do more later with combination of other features. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel