From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EF3C433EF for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1377073AbiDTJQn (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:16:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46284 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235755AbiDTJQm (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 05:16:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0964D31903 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 02:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id b24so1412251edu.10 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 02:13:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uy1g3jy53y3AvCDyaRKjx2hZU3M0SE1McFQysYDpJ6g=; b=sVkWs6/gEi/kZpvBcOC24xw0AINbon9WeAsEYcuyuHaNIyXz581JzcHqJRG24cekbH n+F4/pQInqVwPFVm5eIYZZWpVxUtYksPlTy0mspPAt/A0z5Cz6ahivgTHwae+iD6L3Fo +WFLO2XVatgUVO/VWMVAhyR8Z6rjL4/l4gD2iWFkh8QBvAT494ZQFKH93WsPGfYXcaQL RMjthriOviw7kDpLcnJ3etJaz36q8REMPGCnv2rD8M5I/Mq7ZmlRhfTeGmSLYmCA/UUi NrwJbFGr7tKubU+CcOYAVVur1ZshFunTi+5i4jGabi1zl0GRwec8nqWKhGNHCulg8J4D zsoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uy1g3jy53y3AvCDyaRKjx2hZU3M0SE1McFQysYDpJ6g=; b=tSBoEA5sBKQxUPaGk12sunGToAMronr5i9V1EtaWv5/2Oshv2FXS6KMTe+omgThSL0 Vkv0ZJTXoFzLIq620+qiaKEYPDp+uTXjwfx0FLTtioHQ1fUQFdvjtwAAeFoYSc0AsocG S65LMcllc2aK6LYOMnNDTR6kIXJw06sKpuj/0YfOx+GS9LbeHVBw9pPa0sjuEMBmp8md mpH3PFe8TMlWMLbGpmRwgm4EW8GdWoDxkpph4rJROZNKP8qhnwR9Qo/yyIkLVfdUp3xg xfW6/a0aht70EFNvaqh0qiko3WSNqtj6K7E1dJQVcmZzNLLHf5dSFZFX45K96vAyKzZo xZuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530o2ijMLYP5E8yMj53zS6HLCSuMIxSd3w1oceQzfljtgWxhIXHx rgG/yLJ8S8Q1pDYvYQgraPSsNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzhCXR47Lz6Jg8EQhQwkQMaGjny0D4OGOKqkfdnhoaDItcp9YDAdYgcnLws0h/27iquyLaUiw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:358e:b0:423:fd1c:3453 with SMTP id y14-20020a056402358e00b00423fd1c3453mr8528134edc.403.1650446033624; Wed, 20 Apr 2022 02:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.223] (xdsl-188-155-176-92.adslplus.ch. [188.155.176.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y1-20020a1709063a8100b006efaf54d9c1sm3189197ejd.81.2022.04.20.02.13.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Apr 2022 02:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <70123e98-046f-f10e-1032-8d112edd3ecf@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:13:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] genirq: Always limit the affinity to online CPUs Content-Language: en-US To: Marek Szyprowski , Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel , 'Linux Samsung SOC' , Thomas Gleixner , John Garry , Xiongfeng Wang , David Decotigny References: <20220405185040.206297-1-maz@kernel.org> <20220405185040.206297-3-maz@kernel.org> <4b7fc13c-887b-a664-26e8-45aed13f048a@samsung.com> <878rs8c2t2.wl-maz@kernel.org> <5dcf8d22-e9b3-f306-4c5f-256707e08fbf@samsung.com> <877d7sar5k.wl-maz@kernel.org> <39f69dfe-32e5-4cb3-118b-5c02b28cbcff@samsung.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: <39f69dfe-32e5-4cb3-118b-5c02b28cbcff@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/04/2022 13:08, Marek Szyprowski wrote: >> Thanks for all of the debug, super helpful. The issue is that we don't >> handle the 'force' case, which a handful of drivers are using when >> bringing up CPUs (and doing so before the CPUs are marked online). >> >> Can you please give the below hack a go? > > This patch fixed the issue. Thanks! Feel free to add my: > > Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski > > Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski Hi Marc, Linux-next still fails to boot on Exynos5422 boards, so I wonder if you applied the fix? Instead of silent fail there is now "Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address f0836644", so it is slightly different. See the dmesg: https://krzk.eu/#/builders/21/builds/3542/steps/15/logs/serial0 Best regards, Krzysztof