All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>,
	Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm, memcg: narrow the scope of percpu_charge_mutex
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 18:50:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <702c05c6-fd8b-e1de-21e7-4be5b206958a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZfGtUChsJO1UrgmP6M274UwiHap0_yzCBL+mDq1OosP7JNsA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2021/8/3 17:33, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:29 PM Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/8/3 11:40, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 10:29:52AM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>> On 2021/7/30 14:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>>>> On Thu 29-07-21 20:06:45, Roman Gushchin wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 08:57:52PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>>>>>>> Since percpu_charge_mutex is only used inside drain_all_stock(), we can
>>>>>>> narrow the scope of percpu_charge_mutex by moving it here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> index 6580c2381a3e..a03e24e57cd9 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>>>>> @@ -2050,7 +2050,6 @@ struct memcg_stock_pcp {
>>>>>>>  #define FLUSHING_CACHED_CHARGE   0
>>>>>>>  };
>>>>>>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memcg_stock_pcp, memcg_stock);
>>>>>>> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>>>>>>  static void drain_obj_stock(struct obj_stock *stock);
>>>>>>> @@ -2209,6 +2208,7 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
>>>>>>>   */
>>>>>>>  static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>>>>>>>  {
>>>>>>> + static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex);
>>>>>>>   int cpu, curcpu;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's considered a good practice to protect data instead of code paths. After
>>>>>> the proposed change it becomes obvious that the opposite is done here: the mutex
>>>>>> is used to prevent a simultaneous execution of the code of the drain_all_stock()
>>>>>> function.
>>>>>
>>>>> The purpose of the lock was indeed to orchestrate callers more than any
>>>>> data structure consistency.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually we don't need a mutex here: nobody ever sleeps on it. So I'd replace
>>>>>> it with a simple atomic variable or even a single bitfield. Then the change will
>>>>>> be better justified, IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, mutex can be replaced by an atomic in a follow up patch.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for both of you. It's a really good suggestion. What do you mean is something like below?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>> index 616d1a72ece3..508a96e80980 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>>> @@ -2208,11 +2208,11 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
>>>>   */
>>>>  static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex);
>>>>         int cpu, curcpu;
>>>> +       static atomic_t drain_all_stocks = ATOMIC_INIT(-1);
>>>>
>>>>         /* If someone's already draining, avoid adding running more workers. */
>>>> -       if (!mutex_trylock(&percpu_charge_mutex))
>>>> +       if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&drain_all_stocks))
>>>>                 return;
>>>
>>> It should work, but why not a simple atomic_cmpxchg(&drain_all_stocks, 0, 1) and
>>> initialize it to 0? Maybe it's just my preference, but IMO (0, 1) is easier
>>> to understand than (-1, 0) here. Not a strong opinion though, up to you.
>>>
>>
>> I think this would improve the readability. What you mean is something like below ?
>>
>> Many thanks.
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 616d1a72ece3..6210b1124929 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -2208,11 +2208,11 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
>>   */
>>  static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>>  {
>> -       static DEFINE_MUTEX(percpu_charge_mutex);
>>         int cpu, curcpu;
>> +       static atomic_t drainer = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>>
>>         /* If someone's already draining, avoid adding running more workers. */
>> -       if (!mutex_trylock(&percpu_charge_mutex))
>> +       if (atomic_cmpxchg(&drainer, 0, 1) != 0)
> 
> I'd like to use atomic_cmpxchg_acquire() here.
> 
>>                 return;
>>         /*
>>          * Notify other cpus that system-wide "drain" is running
>> @@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
>>                 }
>>         }
>>         put_cpu();
>> -       mutex_unlock(&percpu_charge_mutex);
>> +       atomic_set(&drainer, 0);
> 
> So use atomic_set_release() here to cooperate with
> atomic_cmpxchg_acquire().

I think this will work well. Many thanks!

> 
> Thanks.
> 
>>  }
>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> .
>>>
>>
> .
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-03 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29 12:57 [PATCH 0/5] Cleanups and fixup for memcontrol Miaohe Lin
2021-07-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 1/5] mm, memcg: remove unused functions Miaohe Lin
2021-07-29 14:07   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-07-29 14:07     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-07-30  2:39   ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  2:39     ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  2:57   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-07-30  6:45   ` Michal Hocko
2021-07-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm, memcg: narrow the scope of percpu_charge_mutex Miaohe Lin
2021-07-30  2:42   ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  2:42     ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  3:06   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-07-30  6:50     ` Michal Hocko
2021-07-31  2:29       ` Miaohe Lin
2021-08-02  6:49         ` Michal Hocko
2021-08-02  9:54           ` Miaohe Lin
2021-08-03  3:40         ` Roman Gushchin
2021-08-03  6:29           ` Miaohe Lin
2021-08-03  7:11             ` Michal Hocko
2021-08-03  7:13               ` Roman Gushchin
2021-08-03  7:27                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-08-03  9:33             ` Muchun Song
2021-08-03  9:33               ` Muchun Song
2021-08-03 10:50               ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2021-08-03 14:15       ` Johannes Weiner
2021-08-04  8:20         ` Michal Hocko
2021-08-05  1:44           ` Miaohe Lin
2021-07-30  6:46   ` Michal Hocko
2021-07-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm, memcg: save some atomic ops when flush is already true Miaohe Lin
2021-07-29 14:40   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-07-29 14:40     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-07-30  2:37   ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  2:37     ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  3:07   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-07-30  6:51   ` Michal Hocko
2021-07-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm, memcg: avoid possible NULL pointer dereferencing in mem_cgroup_init() Miaohe Lin
2021-07-29 13:52   ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-07-30  1:50     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-07-30  3:12   ` Roman Gushchin
2021-07-30  6:29     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-07-30  6:44     ` Michal Hocko
2021-07-31  2:05       ` Miaohe Lin
2021-08-02  6:43         ` Michal Hocko
2021-08-02 10:00           ` Miaohe Lin
2021-08-02 10:42             ` Michal Hocko
2021-08-02 11:18               ` Miaohe Lin
2021-07-29 12:57 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm, memcg: always call __mod_node_page_state() with preempt disabled Miaohe Lin
2021-07-29 14:39   ` Shakeel Butt
2021-07-29 14:39     ` Shakeel Butt
2021-07-30  1:52     ` Miaohe Lin
2021-07-30  2:33       ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-07-30  2:33         ` Muchun Song
2021-07-30  2:46         ` Miaohe Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=702c05c6-fd8b-e1de-21e7-4be5b206958a@huawei.com \
    --to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/5] mm, memcg: narrow the scope of percpu_charge_mutex' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.