All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix imbalance due to CPU affinity
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 10:34:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7111f9d1-62f2-504c-a7ba-958b1c659cc8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561996022-28829-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

On 01/07/2019 16:47, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The load_balance() has a dedicated mecanism to detect when an imbalance
> is due to CPU affinity and must be handled at parent level. In this case,
> the imbalance field of the parent's sched_group is set.
> 
> The description of sg_imbalanced() gives a typical example of two groups
> of 4 CPUs each and 4 tasks each with a cpumask covering 1 CPU of the first
> group and 3 CPUs of the second group. Something like:
> 
> 	{ 0 1 2 3 } { 4 5 6 7 }
> 	        *     * * *
> 
> But the load_balance fails to fix this UC on my octo cores system
> made of 2 clusters of quad cores.
> 
> Whereas the load_balance is able to detect that the imbalanced is due to
> CPU affinity, it fails to fix it because the imbalance field is cleared
> before letting parent level a chance to run. In fact, when the imbalance is
> detected, the load_balance reruns without the CPU with pinned tasks. But
> there is no other running tasks in the situation described above and
> everything looks balanced this time so the imbalance field is immediately
> cleared.
> 
> The imbalance field should not be cleared if there is no other task to move
> when the imbalance is detected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Does that want a

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: afdeee0510db ("sched: Fix imbalance flag reset")

?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-02  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01 15:47 [PATCH v2] sched/fair: fix imbalance due to CPU affinity Vincent Guittot
2019-07-01 19:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-02  9:34 ` Valentin Schneider [this message]
2019-07-02 10:00   ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-02 14:29     ` Valentin Schneider
2019-07-05 12:23       ` Vincent Guittot
2019-07-25 16:13 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Fix " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7111f9d1-62f2-504c-a7ba-958b1c659cc8@arm.com \
    --to=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.