From: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] staging: vt6655: Replace MACvReceive1 with function vt6655_mac_dma_ctl
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 22:00:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71368760-0399-52f2-ca6e-ad8f4daf8003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220718124136.GE2338@kadam>
On 7/18/22 14:41, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:20:25AM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
>> checkpatch.pl does not accept multiline macros.
>>
>
> What? Really?
You are right. It does not really complain about multiline macros but
you cannot have a clean checkpatch check when using more than one macro
containing the same variable. Find more info below.
>
> I tested this to see if was true and it just complained about potential
> side effects on iobase.
>
> regads,
> dan carpenter
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/mac.h b/drivers/staging/vt6655/mac.h
>> index 5747de436911..129a6602f6f0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/mac.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/mac.h
>> @@ -537,16 +537,6 @@
>>
>> /*--------------------- Export Macros ------------------------------*/
>>
>> -#define MACvReceive1(iobase) \
>> -do { \
>> - unsigned long reg_value; \
>> - reg_value = ioread32(iobase + MAC_REG_RXDMACTL1); \
>> - if (reg_value & DMACTL_RUN) \
>> - iowrite32(DMACTL_WAKE, iobase + MAC_REG_RXDMACTL1); \
>> - else \
>> - iowrite32(DMACTL_RUN, iobase + MAC_REG_RXDMACTL1); \
>> -} while (0)
>> -
>> #define MACvTransmit0(iobase) \
>> do { \
>> unsigned long reg_value; \
>
I was asking in kernelnewbies what to do with multi line macros as
checkpatch.pl warnings cannot be totally avoided.
Greg replied to make functions out of them.
Please find the full email under:
https://www.mail-archive.com/kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org/msg22042.html
In this case I really like the static function solution much more than
the macros.
Thanks for your support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-17 22:20 [PATCH 0/7] staging: vt6655: Convert four macros to one function Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] staging: vt6655: Rename dwData to reg_value in four macros Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-18 6:07 ` Joe Perches
2022-07-18 19:33 ` Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] staging: vt6655: Rename MACvReceive0 Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] staging: vt6655: Convert macro vt6655_mac_dma_ctl to function Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] staging: vt6655: Add parameter to function vt6655_mac_dma_ctl Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] staging: vt6655: Replace MACvReceive1 with " Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-18 12:41 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-18 20:00 ` Philipp Hortmann [this message]
2022-07-19 10:04 ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] staging: vt6655: Replace MACvTransmit0 " Philipp Hortmann
2022-07-17 22:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] staging: vt6655: Replace MACvTransmitAC0 " Philipp Hortmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71368760-0399-52f2-ca6e-ad8f4daf8003@gmail.com \
--to=philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=forest@alittletooquiet.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.