From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.6520.1575535753111412842 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:49:13 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@betafive.co.uk header.s=fm3 header.b=Fn8N/zag; spf=pass (domain: betafive.co.uk, ip: 64.147.123.19, mailfrom: paul@betafive.co.uk) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9489BE; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 03:49:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap2 ([10.202.2.52]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 03:49:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=betafive.co.uk; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=m16cT5GKCC2NFuz1fvkttIBuy8cS ZDB7Y85zQlyaTug=; b=Fn8N/zagkI05cqHVnqDeUZvoJjgH6DI60P0iQHzNYXnB KMbD+x276BQsfiL564wJJ7K1DVblzT/lwWf1SVaWt0R1mBQtb5bOx8yziEUpZZIM GtLs+VFAeqbsrz8IEbLHvVxBJQLd7bankgoJljoJTymmuerlz0nAbat64NUwho6d SByPbhAIBsvmmxz63ilUcHKkoHVcoEb9RcVgSlZUpxhEq0J/PXedROZRENkBIKcw qxbzFYvuZlRKsR3x2rhx0z+E510/FDsscEL9IcLQCcTVu3fHYF+XklYMYcpdNgGT BaufYD8t0spuVqRKY/gmWIM9QN88TnJ5ASb0pjHw/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=m16cT5 GKCC2NFuz1fvkttIBuy8cSZDB7Y85zQlyaTug=; b=YCs+pnyanq9uJN74UPfLZO 8LOB1BtxnQrhxjG6c9YKcqORzBo9mYW+fxhGed/FfD2F/qARLbpuWUpMK5mnPmT1 xH1WTtE8jUvRJB73l7DAo9TIyisTjetvA6eDZT8SpMGMSrv44aNNCzqw4t9QVsVK g9Q79ySDMR389zi8WW7549Utnble3tk6wyqDTV8hCPKe/AXc7i5mW/2AdVjTWcKW ZLLtUHbgJR782onAJ3KEh2Z4Vr7vmYEARFTfSQDPJ+hlyp55BzfSPfDegsMCePav p5odQbUryR0rVtqrfwcFF73aN3JzNxk9ysoVbMw5YjJw5eM6ghr+I1dWSvyjhu2w == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudektddguddvfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfrfgr uhhluceurghrkhgvrhdfuceophgruhhlsegsvghtrghfihhvvgdrtghordhukheqnecuff homhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpshgrnhgtlhhouhgurdgtohdruhhknecurfgr rhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehprghulhessggvthgrfhhivhgvrdgtohdruhhknecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 26C78E00A2; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 03:49:11 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-612-g13027cc-fmstable-20191203v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <717103ea-e4b3-4e9e-88eb-e31f80eb1cb3@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1725959.xBGxL0dlV4@shodan> References: <04e3ffe3-4733-4010-ac76-29b72ae20c89@www.fastmail.com> <1725959.xBGxL0dlV4@shodan> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 08:48:48 +0000 From: "Paul Barker" To: "Paul Eggleton" , "Nicolas Dechesne" Cc: "Yocto discussion list" , yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Missing layer in the layer index Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, at 01:37, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday, 4 December 2019 11:10:49 PM NZDT Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > > I'd like to make sure meta-sancloud (https://github.com/SanCloudLtd/meta-> > sancloud) is listed in the layer index. I can't see it listed for either > > > of the branches we support (thud & rocko). However, when I try to add the > > > layer I get the error message "Layer with this Layer name already exists." > > > > > > Perhaps this was already added with an old URL. Is there any way to get > > > this fixed up? > > > > yes, this is the reason. It exists with the following URL: > > https://bitbucket.sancloud.co.uk/scm/yb/meta-sancloud.git > > > > The maintainer for that layer is not listed.. was it you? > > Oddly there are no maintainer records and no layer branch records either, > hence why the layer doesn't show up properly. I'm unsure how it would have got > into that state or how long it's been there, but since it's pretty much > useless I have gone ahead and deleted it - Paul, could you please file your > submission again? Thanks for that, it may have got broken in the layer index when we moved the repo from our private Bitbucket instance over to GitHub. I've resubmitted now. -- Paul Barker