From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SMZPA-0003XG-B2 for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:39:16 +0200 Received: by wera1 with SMTP id a1so246054wer.6 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:29:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=p7KscP1xQTnukIIy630Ljq2E06kuFC9RORjVRdDFnFE=; b=CcG2xkSdBar6v5+8hzrTDgzkNPWt2toSb4/60GPv7eYFmn8t6PksquI069T2MzKQ5d ZKPcfZNsJnhcFwDgJFfs2D+wnsYt4bgluC0qoZpUjgY6piI2P8abZJkkpIw3a9aDXAID PmBZ20B6910Fi0Jo2atXIl2/nsf6Jf4yO/LmjR0Hr2OdrP0SNHPkJMIHW+cLaaxg5ZEU ad9yJIDGY800+0B63z0/8JQCuj5f+pkAl8K2/59fZ8kk+5TesWHXs5dAj3eTValYUZlV MCi/Hpba8iZQVNN77wKuOj97AuCaRkrFGUx+6Emzt8oK6eD7ckQaxufYAUoWZgENFFcv H0Kg== Received: by 10.216.139.29 with SMTP id b29mr1038682wej.55.1335248981527; Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.1.36] (ip545070eb.adsl-surfen.hetnet.nl. [84.80.112.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm27900787wie.9.2012.04.23.23.29.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:29:40 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <4F964456.6050106@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:29:37 +0200 Message-Id: <71A92016-D7C8-4834-8E80-849F267B3B8C@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <7334A38D-4148-4397-94A0-D721CD0BD924@dominion.thruhere.net> <4F964456.6050106@windriver.com> To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaT+kQjX/Jr2wHz9Oqnc0WnPY/X31e+XDpi+/l/R0zYKTJFEYMXaEoJftDS3YvB4dMEUe9 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gdk-pixbuf: Add --with-x11 when building lsb image X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:39:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Op 24 apr. 2012, om 08:12 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven: > On 2012=E5=B9=B404=E6=9C=8824=E6=97=A5 13:53, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 24 apr. 2012, om 07:50 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven: >>=20 >>=20 >>> From: Xiaofeng Yan >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> LSB Test Suite complain "no library libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0" \ >>> because of having "--without-x11" for gdk-pixbuf_2.24.1.bb. >>> For passing lsb test I add PACKAGECONFIG support to the recipe and \ >>> have poky-lsb turn on the poky-lsb distro for this recipe. >>>=20 >>> [YOCTO #2284] >>>=20 >> Shouldn't this be an 'x11' DISTRO_FEATURE instead? >>=20 > because "--without-x11" is disabled when x11 exists in = core-image-sato. Using 'x11' DISTRO_FEATURE instead will change the = default set, which will cause enable "--with-x11" when x11 is in = DISTRO_FEATURE. LSB Test Suite need this configuration but other image = may not need it even if having x11. What use-case is there for having 'x11' in DISTRO_FEATURES but not = wanting x11 support in pixbuf? Regardless of that, poky-lsb distro overrides have no place in oe-core, = they should go into their own layer as bbappends. regards, Koen=