From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, will@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Fix incorrect spinning condition
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:09:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71c5ca50-1bf9-4ef7-eea0-634f66838d4a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211217074207.77425-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
On 12/17/21 02:42, Zqiang wrote:
> When the lock owner is on CPU and not need resched, the current waiter
> need to be checked, if it not longer top the waiter, stop spinning.
Incorrect grammar, should be "if it is no longer the top waiter". There
is a similar typo in the existing code comment too.
You can modify the subject line to [PATCH-tip ...] to indicate that it
is supposed to be apply on top of the tip tree. Other than that, the
patch looks good.
Cheers,
Longman
>
> Fixes: c3123c431447 ("locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless")
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> Modify description information.
>
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> index 0c1f2e3f019a..8555c4efe97c 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
> * - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted
> */
> if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() ||
> - rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
> + !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) {
> res = false;
> break;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-19 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-17 7:42 [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Fix incorrect spinning condition Zqiang
2021-12-17 20:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-18 7:24 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2021-12-18 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-20 1:45 ` Zhang, Qiang1
2021-12-18 10:01 ` [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Fix incorrect condition in rtmutex_spin_on_owner() tip-bot2 for Zqiang
2021-12-19 21:09 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2021-12-20 1:54 ` [PATCH v2] locking/rtmutex: Fix incorrect spinning condition Zhang, Qiang1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=71c5ca50-1bf9-4ef7-eea0-634f66838d4a@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.