From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com Cc: beanhuo@micron.com, cang@codeaurora.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, peter.wang@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, andy.teng@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:31:14 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <725d057c-2379-710e-287f-ac11a59c08bc@codeaurora.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200512104750.8711-5-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote: > Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device > needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend. > > However the UFS specification mentions, > > "While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is > in Active power mode." > > Therefore UFS host driver needs to promise more: Keep UFS > device as "Active power mode", otherwise UFS device shall not > do any flush if device enters Sleep or PowerDown power mode. > > Fix this by not changing device power mode if WriteBooster > flush is required in ufshcd_suspend(). > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 - > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > index b3135344ab3f..9e4bc2e97ada 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > @@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_info { > u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup; > u8 b_wb_buffer_type; > u32 d_wb_alloc_units; > - bool keep_vcc_on; > u8 b_presrv_uspc_en; > }; > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 169a3379e468..2d0aff8ac260 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -8101,8 +8101,7 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba) > !hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) { > ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false); > } else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) { > - if (!hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on) > - ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false); > + ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false); > if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) { > ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq); > ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq2); > @@ -8172,6 +8171,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) > enum ufs_pm_level pm_lvl; > enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode req_dev_pwr_mode; > enum uic_link_state req_link_state; > + bool keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = false; > > hba->pm_op_in_progress = 1; > if (!ufshcd_is_shutdown_pm(pm_op)) { > @@ -8226,28 +8226,27 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) > /* make sure that auto bkops is disabled */ > ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > } > + Unnecessary newline, perhaps? > /* > - * With wb enabled, if the bkops is enabled or if the > - * configured WB type is 70% full, keep vcc ON > - * for the device to flush the wb buffer > + * If device needs to do BKOP or WB buffer flush, keep device > + * power mode as "active power mode" and its VCC supply. > */ > - if ((hba->auto_bkops_enabled && ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) || > - ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba)) > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = true; > - else > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false; > - } else { > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false; > + keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = hba->auto_bkops_enabled || > + ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba); Should the device be in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE to perform auto-bkops? Also, is it needed to keep the device in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE , if flush on hibern8 is enabled and the link is being put to hibern8 mode during runtime-suspend? Perhaps that should also be factored in here? > } > > - if ((req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) && > - ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) || > - !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op))) { > - /* ensure that bkops is disabled */ > - ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > - ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode); > - if (ret) > - goto enable_gating; > + if (req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) { > + if ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) || > + !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op)) { > + /* ensure that bkops is disabled */ > + ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > + } > + > + if (!keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode) { > + ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode); Now, when the WB buffer is completely flushed out, the device should be put back into UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE or UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE. Say, the device buffer has to be flushed and during runtime-suspend, the device is put to UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE and Vcc is kept ON; the device doesn't resume nor does the system enters suspend for a very long time, and with AH8 and hibern8 disabled, there will be an unnecessary power drain for that much time. How about a periodic interval checking of flush status if keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode evaluates to be true? > + if (ret) > + goto enable_gating; > + } > } > > flush_work(&hba->eeh_work); > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, andy.teng@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cang@codeaurora.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:31:14 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <725d057c-2379-710e-287f-ac11a59c08bc@codeaurora.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200512104750.8711-5-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote: > Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device > needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend. > > However the UFS specification mentions, > > "While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is > in Active power mode." > > Therefore UFS host driver needs to promise more: Keep UFS > device as "Active power mode", otherwise UFS device shall not > do any flush if device enters Sleep or PowerDown power mode. > > Fix this by not changing device power mode if WriteBooster > flush is required in ufshcd_suspend(). > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 - > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > index b3135344ab3f..9e4bc2e97ada 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > @@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_info { > u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup; > u8 b_wb_buffer_type; > u32 d_wb_alloc_units; > - bool keep_vcc_on; > u8 b_presrv_uspc_en; > }; > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 169a3379e468..2d0aff8ac260 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -8101,8 +8101,7 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba) > !hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) { > ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false); > } else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) { > - if (!hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on) > - ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false); > + ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false); > if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) { > ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq); > ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq2); > @@ -8172,6 +8171,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) > enum ufs_pm_level pm_lvl; > enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode req_dev_pwr_mode; > enum uic_link_state req_link_state; > + bool keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = false; > > hba->pm_op_in_progress = 1; > if (!ufshcd_is_shutdown_pm(pm_op)) { > @@ -8226,28 +8226,27 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) > /* make sure that auto bkops is disabled */ > ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > } > + Unnecessary newline, perhaps? > /* > - * With wb enabled, if the bkops is enabled or if the > - * configured WB type is 70% full, keep vcc ON > - * for the device to flush the wb buffer > + * If device needs to do BKOP or WB buffer flush, keep device > + * power mode as "active power mode" and its VCC supply. > */ > - if ((hba->auto_bkops_enabled && ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) || > - ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba)) > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = true; > - else > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false; > - } else { > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false; > + keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = hba->auto_bkops_enabled || > + ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba); Should the device be in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE to perform auto-bkops? Also, is it needed to keep the device in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE , if flush on hibern8 is enabled and the link is being put to hibern8 mode during runtime-suspend? Perhaps that should also be factored in here? > } > > - if ((req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) && > - ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) || > - !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op))) { > - /* ensure that bkops is disabled */ > - ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > - ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode); > - if (ret) > - goto enable_gating; > + if (req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) { > + if ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) || > + !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op)) { > + /* ensure that bkops is disabled */ > + ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > + } > + > + if (!keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode) { > + ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode); Now, when the WB buffer is completely flushed out, the device should be put back into UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE or UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE. Say, the device buffer has to be flushed and during runtime-suspend, the device is put to UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE and Vcc is kept ON; the device doesn't resume nor does the system enters suspend for a very long time, and with AH8 and hibern8 disabled, there will be an unnecessary power drain for that much time. How about a periodic interval checking of flush status if keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode evaluates to be true? > + if (ret) > + goto enable_gating; > + } > } > > flush_work(&hba->eeh_work); > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org> To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, andy.teng@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cang@codeaurora.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:31:14 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <725d057c-2379-710e-287f-ac11a59c08bc@codeaurora.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200512104750.8711-5-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote: > Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device > needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend. > > However the UFS specification mentions, > > "While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is > in Active power mode." > > Therefore UFS host driver needs to promise more: Keep UFS > device as "Active power mode", otherwise UFS device shall not > do any flush if device enters Sleep or PowerDown power mode. > > Fix this by not changing device power mode if WriteBooster > flush is required in ufshcd_suspend(). > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 - > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > index b3135344ab3f..9e4bc2e97ada 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h > @@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_info { > u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup; > u8 b_wb_buffer_type; > u32 d_wb_alloc_units; > - bool keep_vcc_on; > u8 b_presrv_uspc_en; > }; > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 169a3379e468..2d0aff8ac260 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -8101,8 +8101,7 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba) > !hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) { > ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false); > } else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) { > - if (!hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on) > - ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false); > + ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false); > if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) { > ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq); > ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq2); > @@ -8172,6 +8171,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) > enum ufs_pm_level pm_lvl; > enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode req_dev_pwr_mode; > enum uic_link_state req_link_state; > + bool keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = false; > > hba->pm_op_in_progress = 1; > if (!ufshcd_is_shutdown_pm(pm_op)) { > @@ -8226,28 +8226,27 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op) > /* make sure that auto bkops is disabled */ > ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > } > + Unnecessary newline, perhaps? > /* > - * With wb enabled, if the bkops is enabled or if the > - * configured WB type is 70% full, keep vcc ON > - * for the device to flush the wb buffer > + * If device needs to do BKOP or WB buffer flush, keep device > + * power mode as "active power mode" and its VCC supply. > */ > - if ((hba->auto_bkops_enabled && ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) || > - ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba)) > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = true; > - else > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false; > - } else { > - hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false; > + keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = hba->auto_bkops_enabled || > + ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba); Should the device be in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE to perform auto-bkops? Also, is it needed to keep the device in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE , if flush on hibern8 is enabled and the link is being put to hibern8 mode during runtime-suspend? Perhaps that should also be factored in here? > } > > - if ((req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) && > - ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) || > - !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op))) { > - /* ensure that bkops is disabled */ > - ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > - ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode); > - if (ret) > - goto enable_gating; > + if (req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) { > + if ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) || > + !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op)) { > + /* ensure that bkops is disabled */ > + ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba); > + } > + > + if (!keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode) { > + ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode); Now, when the WB buffer is completely flushed out, the device should be put back into UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE or UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE. Say, the device buffer has to be flushed and during runtime-suspend, the device is put to UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE and Vcc is kept ON; the device doesn't resume nor does the system enters suspend for a very long time, and with AH8 and hibern8 disabled, there will be an unnecessary power drain for that much time. How about a periodic interval checking of flush status if keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode evaluates to be true? > + if (ret) > + goto enable_gating; > + } > } > > flush_work(&hba->eeh_work); > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-13 19:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-05-12 10:47 [PATCH v1 0/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster and cleanup UFS driver Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] scsi: ufs: Remove unnecessary memset for dev_info Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] scsi: ufs: Allow WriteBooster on UFS 2.2 devices Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] scsi: ufs: Fix index of attributes query for WriteBooster feature Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 10:47 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-12 17:04 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-12 17:04 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-12 17:04 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-13 2:21 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-13 2:21 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-13 2:21 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-13 19:31 ` Asutosh Das (asd) [this message] 2020-05-13 19:31 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-13 19:31 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-14 2:23 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-14 2:23 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-14 2:23 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-14 14:49 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-14 14:49 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-14 14:49 ` Stanley Chu 2020-05-14 16:59 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-14 16:59 ` Asutosh Das (asd) 2020-05-14 16:59 ` Asutosh Das (asd)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=725d057c-2379-710e-287f-ac11a59c08bc@codeaurora.org \ --to=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \ --cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \ --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \ --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \ --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \ --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \ --cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \ --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \ --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \ --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \ --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.