From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580BAC433EF for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230331AbiAWT1s (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:27:48 -0500 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]:44870 "EHLO smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229696AbiAWT1r (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 14:27:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 215C13F1B7 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:27:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1642966066; bh=ppmQZmGXEKGMtrtBOd5SScL6e8veRA8HtdHIjXJZG0w=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=YNGLBkoQhuf5rRR5RaqxyVIhCCXrEMAEcXJiFMCCACaguE+Clj4cps7r3V7tZUflN GjJTCzy7hkr0NfB7QBoD2pouTz5SuXVAuG6OzfgLX+CKo2ZdXb4X9LckEiNU+R8Wbe 3sbrxIg6QlqkFG2cbfotof5dfHDIz/oaox7MGl8lpt+7zKZqhG73uGDIrA8zifZH4X m6hs2LRzUqRJxQ2C7QW0UsMA7upxA/31bs0n6KJ9fDUvtgJrp5XzOmk3+0jPFLt7Cv yXDzmW/aJLTm5J12+AxbjmNjnjLKOLwlSk1+pBkaEVuhPLunPH6BSNR9qIKnkAnYV/ u7KW2kG3qypxQ== Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id o25-20020a056402039900b0040631c2a67dso5477887edv.19 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ppmQZmGXEKGMtrtBOd5SScL6e8veRA8HtdHIjXJZG0w=; b=PkhJiUxP3ODtbgpSk6POqb+RaWMiKlTzcnY0ybuLyxZZ4+DOr/MasRXbnx16zP4YI5 XGvAq0isbVW0zI0Yu4fGelj5kZfw31+Tul74z0uDcwitaSIkSmuSl1cMeGzeh3iQV3QY 3y28dGEpMNv38op44g8YW1jFSzkkYGrJBiBSAiti4JsJq7HT/Ghi1bsIUHnIiWmcOOjG J2zJkwNnMvXzu5+gyMUnkPXqtLoJdponfWz1K60FC2+3P/ApMOUKz29VXmfeZcpdgR04 r5J/KxFetPAjTLRvtgqPUQywAqI+czugCmi5zviv+zhcX0d0aw5VLJd8Ihe7DpPj2Cnr UPXg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532pzUZESkjpSWBbHHp+vhCGyslvHPv+u7mEONBBc3IoiIwdPwfy PIcQ6HTm12MTZWTU8yfCiHV7X63lsAlGki0tpziOp88eeTkYazjAdJYYzciwsMepecyNlOCgxIj PLhQIAg3mv8cHf170hIw81qko8Apd1e10dfE5xHR9Jg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:948d:: with SMTP id dm13mr10172426ejc.497.1642966065734; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYdWmSNLpkZ+Kmyls8Ku61DVbiK+Tc7UmnRy4ygyhjafJ3yLRtLz1Z7RyK/7j1hq0JpfWVcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:948d:: with SMTP id dm13mr10172415ejc.497.1642966065553; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (xdsl-188-155-168-84.adslplus.ch. [188.155.168.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g15sm5380240edy.77.2022.01.23.11.27.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <72a50afd-df9f-ceb3-898e-070d70dc0221@canonical.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:27:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 Content-Language: en-US To: Sam Protsenko , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann Cc: arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22/01/2022 13:38, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 18:53, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Olof, Arnd, >>>> >>>> Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in >>>> v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. >>> >>> I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in >>> the soc tree, >>> so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. >> >> Yep, will be sent up today most likely. >> > > Thanks for detailed answer! Glad to hear it's still a possibility. > Please let me know if you need any actions on my side (like rebasing, > etc). > >>> With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the >>> contents (anything >>> I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended >>> up in the "late" branch. >>> >>> As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen >>> no indication of any problems so far. >> >> Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes >> coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional >> fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the >> late branch gets merged. :) Olof, v5.17-rc1 came earlier, so I see this part did not make into it. Is there a chance for a past-rc1 pull to Linus with it? Sam, Anyway the patches wont' get lost (you mentioned such worry in previous email to me). They might just need to wait. Unfortunately if patch, especially with new feature, is coming in the end of cycle, there is a risk it won't make it. The patches have to wait a few days in my trees before I send them to Arnd/Olof, so if the patch is coming after rc6, I can push it to Arnd/Olof around rc7, you see there is very little time. Best regards, Krzysztof From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97683C433F5 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:33:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lrz0y75uyL0rbfE18XB/6y/BOuBW3EDo3y7RxG9hcU0=; b=DMviQzx6e0qMb1 UmY1oEcW2QaGbNOSyoL52wPdGtKMkQ5gitEjrzJDChuMFHP0+biP49r3UPNn4p+L8hWCR2BE9wCec nXsjzrv9sFOLX7QeJaLh3cqRc5Vg1lPT5Qp4a1WinkFCPl+zDUEPlxlGWll5aaLEB5Y4YH6qI3mnH mnHJ8CcCWbgtrYAz0owDEEXGa05P5DUZWuKJRGCeQBSKMQer6mAnu4xyPCKAU44l6/IHD4PV5XQOi 8FOFOvjuPB8NrTPVQpJBT7mOSJtNdUNHHusLSpNxfOINAxSMDzfqW/CwhdccF84ithq0YXmhzzRtv VBbTU0aEPbEf/vMcJ5+w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nBiaQ-001gcI-J0; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:31:41 +0000 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com ([185.125.188.122]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nBiWi-001fTp-3r for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:27:49 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-0.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FEA3F324 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 19:27:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1642966066; bh=ppmQZmGXEKGMtrtBOd5SScL6e8veRA8HtdHIjXJZG0w=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=YNGLBkoQhuf5rRR5RaqxyVIhCCXrEMAEcXJiFMCCACaguE+Clj4cps7r3V7tZUflN GjJTCzy7hkr0NfB7QBoD2pouTz5SuXVAuG6OzfgLX+CKo2ZdXb4X9LckEiNU+R8Wbe 3sbrxIg6QlqkFG2cbfotof5dfHDIz/oaox7MGl8lpt+7zKZqhG73uGDIrA8zifZH4X m6hs2LRzUqRJxQ2C7QW0UsMA7upxA/31bs0n6KJ9fDUvtgJrp5XzOmk3+0jPFLt7Cv yXDzmW/aJLTm5J12+AxbjmNjnjLKOLwlSk1+pBkaEVuhPLunPH6BSNR9qIKnkAnYV/ u7KW2kG3qypxQ== Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id bc24-20020a056402205800b00407cf07b2e0so1204047edb.8 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ppmQZmGXEKGMtrtBOd5SScL6e8veRA8HtdHIjXJZG0w=; b=sdYOLcbJDcYIbDM8EI1SOoyLsLA1DSVnBc6vOFiJlmla2dHf7YVRqMDMdBFguLVhv7 dgF0wS6fD6e22pNLuj5jd6rIHCfVOBiV7PXMiOdd5IO/vpOWBiCdHm3hCI1JIoanx9QJ SMnVdH+EsmWws5i/qIwD7IncwJmyu7csJ/HWs16EqThuL9Imru/wWUuwLvKTubOe6Byn TpdjyUFPbE4iPAdR2yZV6EhNNq6pPjY3KiuvmSe2bLkmWJl+pMtOZVp4mfq5PRu8q/Yv Rym2yttfjGk28uhqcVKH0pVwrJEkZYTVhioPM3PWh1LRxJYaw7ZBAK1UQzEX8tAiqQHp t7bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Jfo5g7PSI4yQ1/Zr0icE+Y6fJOEAWpyrElFB08lUDwmylN18i Dh0+raixSbVS88+ny1rGaETumGJMeXKdzKiVKQelrngHgTuk5YoHPWgO9LEEW29KIKPBt/dx5vj EoLLXFL5OMrrruStbyfFl2yU4mjmgJQSm6osC8VAfEp9ruh6FlgNS X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:948d:: with SMTP id dm13mr10172427ejc.497.1642966065736; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYdWmSNLpkZ+Kmyls8Ku61DVbiK+Tc7UmnRy4ygyhjafJ3yLRtLz1Z7RyK/7j1hq0JpfWVcQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:948d:: with SMTP id dm13mr10172415ejc.497.1642966065553; Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.52] (xdsl-188-155-168-84.adslplus.ch. [188.155.168.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g15sm5380240edy.77.2022.01.23.11.27.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jan 2022 11:27:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <72a50afd-df9f-ceb3-898e-070d70dc0221@canonical.com> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 20:27:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] arm64: dts: samsung: Second pull for v5.17 Content-Language: en-US To: Sam Protsenko , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann Cc: arm-soc , SoC Team , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Krzysztof Kozlowski References: <20211227112959.7325-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220123_112748_419290_5A3D00BD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 22/01/2022 13:38, Sam Protsenko wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 18:53, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 4:11 PM Sam Protsenko >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 13:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Olof, Arnd, >>>> >>>> Just want to check if it's possible for those patches to be applied in >>>> v5.17? Sorry for the noise, but that's important to me. >>> >>> I can see that Olof merged merged this into the "arm/late" branch in >>> the soc tree, >>> so I assume he still plans to send it in the next few days. >> >> Yep, will be sent up today most likely. >> > > Thanks for detailed answer! Glad to hear it's still a possibility. > Please let me know if you need any actions on my side (like rebasing, > etc). > >>> With the timing over Christmas, I sent out the large bulk of the >>> contents (anything >>> I merged before Dec 23) last year, and Linus already merged it, the rest ended >>> up in the "late" branch. >>> >>> As usual, there is no guarantee that late changes make it in, but I have seen >>> no indication of any problems so far. >> >> Correct. Been sitting on it for a while in case there were fixes >> coming in for the first pieces that got merged, but in traditional >> fashion I'm guessing those will start to show up a few days after the >> late branch gets merged. :) Olof, v5.17-rc1 came earlier, so I see this part did not make into it. Is there a chance for a past-rc1 pull to Linus with it? Sam, Anyway the patches wont' get lost (you mentioned such worry in previous email to me). They might just need to wait. Unfortunately if patch, especially with new feature, is coming in the end of cycle, there is a risk it won't make it. The patches have to wait a few days in my trees before I send them to Arnd/Olof, so if the patch is coming after rc6, I can push it to Arnd/Olof around rc7, you see there is very little time. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel