From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760871AbbA2JO2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:14:28 -0500 Received: from ip4-83-240-67-251.cust.nbox.cz ([83.240.67.251]:44927 "EHLO ip4-83-240-18-248.cust.nbox.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932761AbbA2JIY (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:08:24 -0500 From: Jiri Slaby To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka , Vladimir Davydov , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Jiri Slaby Subject: [PATCH 3.12 054/176] mm, vmscan: prevent kswapd livelock due to pfmemalloc-throttled process being killed Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:28:04 +0100 Message-Id: <72af0d9afe2fcf9ed7c72526367c32dd2c753b58.1422455352.git.jslaby@suse.cz> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.2.2 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Vlastimil Babka 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. =============== commit 9e5e3661727eaf960d3480213f8e87c8d67b6956 upstream. Charles Shirron and Paul Cassella from Cray Inc have reported kswapd stuck in a busy loop with nothing left to balance, but kswapd_try_to_sleep() failing to sleep. Their analysis found the cause to be a combination of several factors: 1. A process is waiting in throttle_direct_reclaim() on pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait 2. The process has been killed (by OOM in this case), but has not yet been scheduled to remove itself from the waitqueue and die. 3. kswapd checks for throttled processes in prepare_kswapd_sleep(): if (waitqueue_active(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait)) { wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait); return false; // kswapd will not go to sleep } However, for a process that was already killed, wake_up() does not remove the process from the waitqueue, since try_to_wake_up() checks its state first and returns false when the process is no longer waiting. 4. kswapd is running on the same CPU as the only CPU that the process is allowed to run on (through cpus_allowed, or possibly single-cpu system). 5. CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y kernel is used. If there's nothing to balance, kswapd encounters no voluntary preemption points and repeatedly fails prepare_kswapd_sleep(), blocking the process from running and removing itself from the waitqueue, which would let kswapd sleep. So, the source of the problem is that we prevent kswapd from going to sleep until there are processes waiting on the pfmemalloc_wait queue, and a process waiting on a queue is guaranteed to be removed from the queue only when it gets scheduled. This was done to make sure that no process is left sleeping on pfmemalloc_wait when kswapd itself goes to sleep. However, it isn't necessary to postpone kswapd sleep until the pfmemalloc_wait queue actually empties. To prevent processes from being left sleeping, it's actually enough to guarantee that all processes waiting on pfmemalloc_wait queue have been woken up by the time we put kswapd to sleep. This patch therefore fixes this issue by substituting 'wake_up' with 'wake_up_all' and removing 'return false' in the code snippet from prepare_kswapd_sleep() above. Note that if any process puts itself in the queue after this waitqueue_active() check, or after the wake up itself, it means that the process will also wake up kswapd - and since we are under prepare_to_wait(), the wake up won't be missed. Also we update the comment prepare_kswapd_sleep() to hopefully more clearly describe the races it is preventing. Fixes: 5515061d22f0 ("mm: throttle direct reclaimers if PF_MEMALLOC reserves are low and swap is backed by network storage") Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Rik van Riel Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby --- mm/vmscan.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 5461d02ea718..ee8363f73cab 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2868,18 +2868,20 @@ static bool prepare_kswapd_sleep(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining, return false; /* - * There is a potential race between when kswapd checks its watermarks - * and a process gets throttled. There is also a potential race if - * processes get throttled, kswapd wakes, a large process exits therby - * balancing the zones that causes kswapd to miss a wakeup. If kswapd - * is going to sleep, no process should be sleeping on pfmemalloc_wait - * so wake them now if necessary. If necessary, processes will wake - * kswapd and get throttled again + * The throttled processes are normally woken up in balance_pgdat() as + * soon as pfmemalloc_watermark_ok() is true. But there is a potential + * race between when kswapd checks the watermarks and a process gets + * throttled. There is also a potential race if processes get + * throttled, kswapd wakes, a large process exits thereby balancing the + * zones, which causes kswapd to exit balance_pgdat() before reaching + * the wake up checks. If kswapd is going to sleep, no process should + * be sleeping on pfmemalloc_wait, so wake them now if necessary. If + * the wake up is premature, processes will wake kswapd and get + * throttled again. The difference from wake ups in balance_pgdat() is + * that here we are under prepare_to_wait(). */ - if (waitqueue_active(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait)) { - wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait); - return false; - } + if (waitqueue_active(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait)) + wake_up_all(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait); return pgdat_balanced(pgdat, order, classzone_idx); } -- 2.2.2