From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Suresh Shelvapille" Subject: RE: Qperf and APM Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:43:53 -0400 Message-ID: <74591EB782934BB7AF174B177BA3BE35@md.baymicrosystems.com> References: <1358891797-14625-1-git-send-email-sean.hefty@intel.com> <1358891797-14625-2-git-send-email-sean.hefty@intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A8237368B99D59@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823736F35600F@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <82EBBE0B04D4427381C29144BE078F2B@md.baymicrosystems.com> <4AF12E8016D2BF46BCDFCE8FAA77A3580394D479@fmsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com> <58D79FF01489431AB6D87CD4977F2E45@md.baymicrosystems.com> <4AF12E8016D2BF46BCDFCE8FAA77A3580394D4FB@fmsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com> <8AF67C8E913E4EE49D65CABA83E3DEBF@md.baymicrosystems.com> <4AF12E8016D2BF46BCDFCE8FAA77A3580394F46B@fmsmsx109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AF12E8016D2BF46BCDFCE8FAA77A3580394F46B-96pTJSsuoYQd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "'Luick, Dean'" , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Dean: The difference is, you got a BW number where as I don't! So, I don't know whether the test was successful or not. Do you have a Mellanox dual port card? Mellanox folks: have you guys tried this on your dual port cards? Thanks, Suri > -----Original Message----- > From: Luick, Dean [mailto:dean.luick-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:25 PM > To: Suresh Shelvapille; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > Subject: RE: Qperf and APM > > Using QLogic dual port HCAs, this works for me when I disable port 1 on the client, server, or both > while the test is running: > > # qperf -ap 2 -t 30 rc_bw > rc_bw: > warning: -ap set but not used in test rc_bw > bw = 272 MB/sec > > The warning can be ignored. Using -ap is equivalent to using -rap and -lap with the same port. > > The "failed to receive results" is qperf saying that once the test finished, the server did not > contact the client. > > > Dean > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Suresh Shelvapille [mailto:suri-lFb5ksp6isWhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 4:24 PM > > To: Luick, Dean; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > Subject: RE: Qperf and APM > > > > I can see the packets going on the alternate path when the first link fails, but > > at the end of the test, the result is a > > failure, so I am not sure! > > I tried this with both '-ap' and "-lap -rap" options. I am assuming they are > > equivalent. > > > > ------------------------------ > > [root]# qperf -ap 2 -t 30 rc_bw > > rc_bw: > > warning: -ap set but not used in test rc_bw > > failed to receive results: timed out > > > > > > > > ------------------------- > > [root]# qperf -lap 2 -rap 2 -t 30 rc_bw > > rc_bw: > > warning: -lap set but not used in test rc_bw > > warning: -rap set but not used in test rc_bw > > failed to receive results: timed out > > > > thanks, > > Suri > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Luick, Dean [mailto:dean.luick-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 3:57 PM > > > To: Suresh Shelvapille; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > Subject: RE: Qperf and APM > > > > > > Have you tried ignoring the warning and checking of the alternate port > > works? The qperf code looks > > > to be using the alternate port, but incorrectly fails to mark the argument as > > used. > > > > > > Dean > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org [mailto:linux-rdma- > > > > owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Shelvapille > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 1:00 PM > > > > To: Luick, Dean; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > > Subject: RE: Qperf and APM > > > > > > > > This is the error I see on the client(the same warning is seen with -lap and > > - > > > > rap options): > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > qperf -ap 2 rc_bw > > > > rc_bw: > > > > warning: -ap set but not used in test rc_bw > > > > bw = 3.39 GB/sec > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Luick, Dean [mailto:dean.luick-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 1:52 PM > > > > > To: Suresh Shelvapille; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > > > Cc: Hefty, Sean > > > > > Subject: RE: Qperf and APM > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Can you be more specific? What are you running and how is it failing? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Dean > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org [mailto:linux-rdma- > > > > > > owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Shelvapille > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 9:40 AM > > > > > > To: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > > > > Cc: Hefty, Sean > > > > > > Subject: Qperf and APM > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks: > > > > > > The qperf utility has -ap, -lap, -rap options in support of APM. > > > > Unfortunately > > > > > > they don't seem to work. Is there a way > > > > > > to make this work, or if you have any other ideas on testing failover > > using > > > > > > rdma please let me know. I have successfully > > > > > > used tcp_bw tests for this purpose already. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Suri > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" > > in > > > > > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo- > > info.html > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > > > > the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html