From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 948F21876 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:51:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:6624:6d8d:f790:d5c]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1nhTSw-0005SS-9u; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:51:10 +0200 Message-ID: <745e356a-0d4c-966b-66cb-e4067ca33d40@leemhuis.info> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 11:51:09 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: Bug 215777 - ath11k: 5.17.x causes cpu soft-lock on xps13 9310 #forregzbot Content-Language: en-US From: Thorsten Leemhuis To: "regressions@lists.linux.dev" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1650534672;c6589778; X-HE-SMSGID: 1nhTSw-0005SS-9u TWIMC: this mail is primarily send for documentation purposes and for regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot. These mails usually contain '#forregzbot' in the subject, to make them easy to spot and filter. #regzbot fixed-by: 1f682dc9fb3790a #regzbot from: Dominik Förderer On 08.04.22 10:20, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking. > > About a week ago a regression was reported to bugzilla.kernel.org that > seems to be handled there already, nevertheless I'd like to add to the > tracking to ensure it's not forgotten. > > #regzbot introduced: 9dcf6808b253a72b2c90eed179863bf5fab7d68c > #regzbot from: dominik.foerderer@windeck-gymnasium.de > > #regzbot title: net: wifi: ath11k: 5.17.x causes cpu soft-lock on xps13 > 9310 > #regzbot link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215777 > > See the ticket for details, there were a few replies already. > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I'm getting a lot of > reports on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them and lack > knowledge about most of the areas they concern. I thus unfortunately > will sometimes get things wrong or miss something important. I hope > that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't hesitate to tell me > in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record > straight. >