From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, PDS_BAD_THREAD_QP_64,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88681C433B4 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CF6611BF for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234948AbhDPPrB (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:47:01 -0400 Received: from mx01-sz.bfs.de ([194.94.69.67]:2142 "EHLO mx01-sz.bfs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233213AbhDPPrB (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:47:01 -0400 Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (exchange-sz.bfs.de [10.129.90.31]) by mx01-sz.bfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A437E20655; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:46:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bfs.de; s=dkim201901; t=1618587993; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xJxOBG5jSFFu/TpkhJoGy0ryjnhgX4CzCYI4/QEyTg4=; b=uZ1Wd0QW79Y08RN9+hSylExzjrqTHE4R+ietr5Xq2Dc/y7Ly4LKb9pgv2h4PhMztlaDgFI l91ZmhkAM0E7zT3+nvK4F2hCdkkOAiRTMwQn7HSi49WSdEh6Zmd6fQ73U45J/WBfBniIt0 +xSw1Mkzc6aJsKVsDmCov21c+sNlPbN9sGvV7G4QPvsgtLaW3mgDn39/4wRCxb3qzloI4f mueV6ytvMg8cYW0kB8ZY7RCErsKG8DEyVuycWq36M9/bWd7ev9JPfhQ41dTC5RV5m/nnNS 08uyjvIuRSZcwb0Hh2WCGoFMTpXwxkeINxFXf3TFfeseLJEDDSFlzCWvDqhRqQ== Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (10.129.90.31) by SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern (10.129.90.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2176.2; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:46:32 +0200 Received: from SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern ([fe80::7d2d:f9cb:2761:d24a]) by SRVEX01-SZ.bfs.intern ([fe80::7d2d:f9cb:2761:d24a%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:46:32 +0200 From: Walter Harms To: Utkarsh Singh , "linux-man@vger.kernel.org" , "alx.manpages@gmail.com" , "mtk.manpages@gmail.com" Subject: AW: umask.1p: Can we add a table for octal and symbolic notation? Thread-Topic: umask.1p: Can we add a table for octal and symbolic notation? Thread-Index: AQHXIMGk1uPs01FWqkaAnDB4rwhglaq3W77n Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:46:32 +0000 Message-ID: <747334490ab842f7b7816bad09a6d2fd@bfs.de> References: <878s6cbmm1.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <878s6cbmm1.fsf@gmail.com> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.137.16.39] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-14.0.0.3080-8.6.1012-26096.001 x-tm-as-result: No-10--1.618500-5.000000 x-tmase-matchedrid: CDTSlS88fVTvXj+qSBwlrhvgzEPRJaDEKQNhMboqZloTiSW9r3PknArV qGrinAXDSLX/wjk94KaYHb4xZ59iP8+9kIneOZlhifYNsPPgB9YXivwflisSrFibt1Tapb7sN4I xix1zvwXnHqJEtsM2g7xFpZGWIKcrzECxVOnBRA4eTAX99VElYA8JAnaMw0RV/q/20XcvFJXaA6 vVR1pR1kZ02jSQiO2TGdtMUojgqQcvD1MLZgs3kp1U1lojafr/3JwFMzrIETkUFDkgqWz8DohwH j/iDNtwsxzDX09sk0ubKItl61J/yZkw8KdMzN86KrauXd3MZDX371moSn0VOHl1muQ7mwpfqbRM VXqvadBCXlnEOGn1Kv5z1LWUzph36OVqKHY/qJ4qe/LX7U5aZL6h8M3Bx4hncb1wJpgOzeVO5Sz z8Z32FjyV3D5IMRMJm2C2cLnXbN+PaW6Ua24rHSDFuFEiHCqrnqg/VrSZEiM= x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No x-tmase-result: 10--1.618500-5.000000 x-tmase-version: SMEX-14.0.0.3080-8.6.1012-26096.001 x-tm-snts-smtp: 0D2CE16FA030302FC1EF29EDC22BD604804B4A2DD10CADA016E121783BDED4362000:9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Authentication-Results: mx01-sz.bfs.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-16.72 / 7.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[bfs.de:s=dkim201901]; WHITELIST_LOCAL_IP(-15.00)[10.129.90.31]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,vger.kernel.org]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-2.72)[98.78%] Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hello everybody, i did no see any answer.=20 How is maintaining the posix-pages organized ?=20 re, wh ________________________________________ Von: Utkarsh Singh Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. M=E4rz 2021 16:24 An: linux-man@vger.kernel.org; alx.manpages@gmail.com; mtk.manpages@gmail.c= om Betreff: umask.1p: Can we add a table for octal and symbolic notation? WARNUNG: Diese E-Mail kam von au=DFerhalb der Organisation. Klicken Sie nic= ht auf Links oder =F6ffnen Sie keine Anh=E4nge, es sei denn, Sie kennen den= /die Absender*in und wissen, dass der Inhalt sicher ist. Hi, The POSIX.1 standard man page for umask is a really well written document but lacks some notes for beginners. For example comparing umask.1p to I really liked how Wikipedia added table for showing octal digits in umask command to their corresponding action. Can we do a similar thing for umask.1p or how can I contact The Open Group to make changes into their manual? -- Utkarsh Singh