From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 00/13] arm/tegra: Initialize GPIO & pinmux from DT Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:07:00 -0700 Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B24A40D2@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1314315824-9687-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Grant Likely , Colin Cross , Erik Gilling , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Belisko Marek , Jamie Iles , Shawn Guo , Sergei Shtylyov , Linus Walleij List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:05 PM: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > v3: ... > This is looking pretty sane to me. > > Grant, how do you prefer to handle this, since it spans of/dt, gpio > and tegra code? I can start a topic branch for Arnd to pull in for the > tegra parts, would you prefer picking up the of helper functions on > your own or is an ack from you and merge through the arm-soc tree > easier? I haven't thought through all the merging details yet, but do be aware of the dependencies this patchset has: 1) Rename of arch/arm/mach-tegra/gpio.c -> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c This is in Grant's gpio for-next branch, and hence linux-next. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's. 2) Various previous Tegra rework. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's; I assume the same one as (1), but I can't actually find this branch, so can't check. Neither of those is in any Linus release or rc. I *think* that's it. For reference, this patchset was physical written/tested on top of next-20110823, with the patches mentioned in (2) aboe, and some others that hopefully aren't relevant, between linux-next and this patchset. -- nvpublic From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754795Ab1HZQHV (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:07:21 -0400 Received: from hqemgate03.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.140]:18073 "EHLO hqemgate03.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754352Ab1HZQHT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:07:19 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp07.nvidia.com on Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:07:03 -0700 From: Stephen Warren To: Olof Johansson CC: Grant Likely , Colin Cross , Erik Gilling , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Belisko Marek , Jamie Iles , Shawn Guo , Sergei Shtylyov , Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:07:00 -0700 Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 00/13] arm/tegra: Initialize GPIO & pinmux from DT Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 00/13] arm/tegra: Initialize GPIO & pinmux from DT Thread-Index: AcxjraSNAHrGl3f9QS2Cj+wS4qr0jQAW537g Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B24A40D2@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1314315824-9687-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:05 PM: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > v3: ... > This is looking pretty sane to me. > > Grant, how do you prefer to handle this, since it spans of/dt, gpio > and tegra code? I can start a topic branch for Arnd to pull in for the > tegra parts, would you prefer picking up the of helper functions on > your own or is an ack from you and merge through the arm-soc tree > easier? I haven't thought through all the merging details yet, but do be aware of the dependencies this patchset has: 1) Rename of arch/arm/mach-tegra/gpio.c -> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c This is in Grant's gpio for-next branch, and hence linux-next. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's. 2) Various previous Tegra rework. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's; I assume the same one as (1), but I can't actually find this branch, so can't check. Neither of those is in any Linus release or rc. I *think* that's it. For reference, this patchset was physical written/tested on top of next-20110823, with the patches mentioned in (2) aboe, and some others that hopefully aren't relevant, between linux-next and this patchset. -- nvpublic From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swarren@nvidia.com (Stephen Warren) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:07:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 00/13] arm/tegra: Initialize GPIO & pinmux from DT In-Reply-To: References: <1314315824-9687-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B24A40D2@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Olof Johansson wrote at Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:05 PM: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > v3: ... > This is looking pretty sane to me. > > Grant, how do you prefer to handle this, since it spans of/dt, gpio > and tegra code? I can start a topic branch for Arnd to pull in for the > tegra parts, would you prefer picking up the of helper functions on > your own or is an ack from you and merge through the arm-soc tree > easier? I haven't thought through all the merging details yet, but do be aware of the dependencies this patchset has: 1) Rename of arch/arm/mach-tegra/gpio.c -> drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c This is in Grant's gpio for-next branch, and hence linux-next. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's. 2) Various previous Tegra rework. This is in some GPIO-related branch of Russell's; I assume the same one as (1), but I can't actually find this branch, so can't check. Neither of those is in any Linus release or rc. I *think* that's it. For reference, this patchset was physical written/tested on top of next-20110823, with the patches mentioned in (2) aboe, and some others that hopefully aren't relevant, between linux-next and this patchset. -- nvpublic