From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:59:07 -0700 Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B7321434@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1314914676-28397-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare> <4E609F9C.5020403@cam.ac.uk> <20110902112435.69c9e8f7@endymion.delvare> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B327A628@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20110906225708.GA28957@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110906225708.GA28957@kroah.com> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Sender: devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org To: Greg KH Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , Andrew Chew , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , Grant Likely , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , Jonathan Cameron , Ben Dooks , Jean Delvare , "spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote at Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:57 PM: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:24:04AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Jean Delvare wrote at Friday, September 02, 2011 3:25 AM: ... > > > > Why not make it platform data for now and 'if' it becomes way more common > > > > (probably won't) we can always propose adding as a general field at a later > > > > date. > > > > > > Yes, this sounds like a much more reasonable approach. > > > > BTW, if that's the direction that's decided, just take the first version > > of the patchset I posted, plus Jonathan Cameron's subsequent patch to > > modify ak8975 to accept GPIO ID through platform data. > > I don't know which patchset that would be, can you please just resend > what you want applied so that I know I get the correct one? Sorry for the slow response; I was on vacation for the last couple weeks. I've now posted an updated version of this patchset, without any of the changes for I2C/SPI core/types/... -- nvpublic From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932618Ab1ISV7c (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:59:32 -0400 Received: from hqemgate04.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.35]:11884 "EHLO hqemgate04.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753988Ab1ISV7a convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:59:30 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp05.nvidia.com on Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:59:09 -0700 From: Stephen Warren To: Greg KH CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Cameron , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , Andrew Chew , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Dooks , "spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:59:07 -0700 Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info. Thread-Topic: [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info. Thread-Index: Acxs6M9G8OWX57DrSdOxPI2yjOxKIQKLl+Bw Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B7321434@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1314914676-28397-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare> <4E609F9C.5020403@cam.ac.uk> <20110902112435.69c9e8f7@endymion.delvare> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B327A628@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20110906225708.GA28957@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20110906225708.GA28957@kroah.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote at Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:57 PM: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:24:04AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Jean Delvare wrote at Friday, September 02, 2011 3:25 AM: ... > > > > Why not make it platform data for now and 'if' it becomes way more common > > > > (probably won't) we can always propose adding as a general field at a later > > > > date. > > > > > > Yes, this sounds like a much more reasonable approach. > > > > BTW, if that's the direction that's decided, just take the first version > > of the patchset I posted, plus Jonathan Cameron's subsequent patch to > > modify ak8975 to accept GPIO ID through platform data. > > I don't know which patchset that would be, can you please just resend > what you want applied so that I know I get the correct one? Sorry for the slow response; I was on vacation for the last couple weeks. I've now posted an updated version of this patchset, without any of the changes for I2C/SPI core/types/... -- nvpublic From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Stephen Warren To: Greg KH CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Cameron , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , Andrew Chew , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Dooks , "spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:59:07 -0700 Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info. Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B7321434@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1314914676-28397-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare> <4E609F9C.5020403@cam.ac.uk> <20110902112435.69c9e8f7@endymion.delvare> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B327A628@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> <20110906225708.GA28957@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20110906225708.GA28957@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-ID: Greg KH wrote at Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:57 PM: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 11:24:04AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > Jean Delvare wrote at Friday, September 02, 2011 3:25 AM: ... > > > > Why not make it platform data for now and 'if' it becomes way more = common > > > > (probably won't) we can always propose adding as a general field at= a later > > > > date. > > > > > > Yes, this sounds like a much more reasonable approach. > > > > BTW, if that's the direction that's decided, just take the first versio= n > > of the patchset I posted, plus Jonathan Cameron's subsequent patch to > > modify ak8975 to accept GPIO ID through platform data. >=20 > I don't know which patchset that would be, can you please just resend > what you want applied so that I know I get the correct one? Sorry for the slow response; I was on vacation for the last couple weeks. I've now posted an updated version of this patchset, without any of the changes for I2C/SPI core/types/... --=20 nvpublic