All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Flush the RING stop bit after clearing RING_HEAD in reset
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:33:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74bbb686-71d7-39cf-7ccc-d1ef15ec59f2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517142442.16979-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>


On 17/05/2018 15:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Inside the live_hangcheck (reset) selftests, we occasionally see
> failures like
> 
> <7>[  239.094840] i915_gem_set_wedged rcs0
> <7>[  239.094843] i915_gem_set_wedged 	current seqno 19a98, last 19a9a, hangcheck 0 [5158 ms]
> <7>[  239.094846] i915_gem_set_wedged 	Reset count: 6239 (global 1)
> <7>[  239.094848] i915_gem_set_wedged 	Requests:
> <7>[  239.095052] i915_gem_set_wedged 		first  19a99 [e8c:5f] prio=1024 @ 5159ms: (null)
> <7>[  239.095056] i915_gem_set_wedged 		last   19a9a [e81:1a] prio=139 @ 5159ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/1
> <7>[  239.095059] i915_gem_set_wedged 		active 19a99 [e8c:5f] prio=1024 @ 5159ms: (null)
> <7>[  239.095062] i915_gem_set_wedged 		[head 0220, postfix 0280, tail 02a8, batch 0xffffffff_ffffffff]
> <7>[  239.100050] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ring->start:  0x00283000
> <7>[  239.100053] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ring->head:   0x000001f8
> <7>[  239.100055] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ring->tail:   0x000002a8
> <7>[  239.100057] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ring->emit:   0x000002a8
> <7>[  239.100059] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ring->space:  0x00000f10
> <7>[  239.100085] i915_gem_set_wedged 	RING_START: 0x00283000
> <7>[  239.100088] i915_gem_set_wedged 	RING_HEAD:  0x00000260
> <7>[  239.100091] i915_gem_set_wedged 	RING_TAIL:  0x000002a8
> <7>[  239.100094] i915_gem_set_wedged 	RING_CTL:   0x00000001
> <7>[  239.100097] i915_gem_set_wedged 	RING_MODE:  0x00000300 [idle]
> <7>[  239.100100] i915_gem_set_wedged 	RING_IMR: fffffefe
> <7>[  239.100104] i915_gem_set_wedged 	ACTHD:  0x00000000_0000609c
> <7>[  239.100108] i915_gem_set_wedged 	BBADDR: 0x00000000_0000609d
> <7>[  239.100111] i915_gem_set_wedged 	DMA_FADDR: 0x00000000_00283260
> <7>[  239.100114] i915_gem_set_wedged 	IPEIR: 0x00000000
> <7>[  239.100117] i915_gem_set_wedged 	IPEHR: 0x02800000
> <7>[  239.100120] i915_gem_set_wedged 	Execlist status: 0x00044052 00000002
> <7>[  239.100124] i915_gem_set_wedged 	Execlist CSB read 5 [5 cached], write 5 [5 from hws], interrupt posted? no, tasklet queued? no (enabled)
> <7>[  239.100128] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ELSP[0] count=1, ring->start=00283000, rq: 19a99 [e8c:5f] prio=1024 @ 5164ms: (null)
> <7>[  239.100132] i915_gem_set_wedged 		ELSP[1] count=1, ring->start=00257000, rq: 19a9a [e81:1a] prio=139 @ 5164ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/1
> <7>[  239.100135] i915_gem_set_wedged 		HW active? 0x5
> <7>[  239.100250] i915_gem_set_wedged 		E 19a99 [e8c:5f] prio=1024 @ 5164ms: (null)
> <7>[  239.100338] i915_gem_set_wedged 		E 19a9a [e81:1a] prio=139 @ 5164ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/1
> <7>[  239.100340] i915_gem_set_wedged 		Queue priority: 139
> <7>[  239.100343] i915_gem_set_wedged 		Q 0 [e98:19] prio=132 @ 5164ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/8
> <7>[  239.100346] i915_gem_set_wedged 		Q 0 [e84:19] prio=121 @ 5165ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/2
> <7>[  239.100349] i915_gem_set_wedged 		Q 0 [e87:19] prio=82 @ 5165ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/3
> <7>[  239.100352] i915_gem_set_wedged 		Q 0 [e84:1a] prio=44 @ 5164ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/2
> <7>[  239.100356] i915_gem_set_wedged 		Q 0 [e8b:19] prio=20 @ 5165ms: igt/rcs0[5977]/4
> <7>[  239.100362] i915_gem_set_wedged 	drv_selftest [5894] waiting for 19a99
> 
> where the GPU saw an arbitration point and idles; AND HAS NOT BEEN RESET!
> The RING_MODE indicates that is idle and has the STOP_RING bit set, so
> try clearing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index b36a3b5736a0..082b0045ac8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -1720,6 +1720,8 @@ static void gen3_stop_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>   	if (I915_READ_FW(RING_HEAD(base)) != 0)
>   		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s: ring head not parked\n",
>   				 engine->name);
> +
> +	I915_WRITE_FW(RING_MI_MODE(base), _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(STOP_RING));
>   }
>   
>   static void i915_stop_engines(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> 

Right, so expectation is after reset STOP_RING will not be set, but it 
sometimes is?

Should we also add a notice or info if it is set in intel_gpu_reset, 
after the reset is called? Could add i915_check_engine_running(..) 
helper or something.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-18  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-17 14:24 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Wait longer for the old active request Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Flush the RING stop bit after clearing RING_HEAD in reset Chris Wilson
2018-05-18  9:33   ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-05-18  9:47     ` Chris Wilson
2018-05-18  9:53       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-18 10:02       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17 15:04 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Wait longer for the old active request Patchwork
2018-05-17 15:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-05-17 16:02 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2018-05-17 16:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-05-18  9:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-05-17 15:47 Chris Wilson
2018-05-17 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Flush the RING stop bit after clearing RING_HEAD in reset Chris Wilson
2018-05-18  7:29   ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74bbb686-71d7-39cf-7ccc-d1ef15ec59f2@linux.intel.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.